I've changed my mind – I forgot about the "fun" part.MartinHarper wrote:How come?
However, generally, if you want to do well in a competition, deciding "no dips or drops" is likely to limit your chances. (I do have a counter example though!)
I've changed my mind – I forgot about the "fun" part.MartinHarper wrote:How come?
Why? Dips and drops are often used to run contrary to musical interpretation than with it ...... [lights blue touchpaper etc.ducasi wrote:However, generally, if you want to do well in a competition, deciding "no dips or drops" is likely to limit your chances.
That's a valid point because its at the expense of musciality, but what happens occasionally in the Advanced level over here is that sometimes you come across a gem of man who can successfully put the two together. Not that he's the one being judged at the time of this capability.Gus wrote:Why? Dips and drops are often used to run contrary to musical interpretation than with it ...... [lights blue touchpaper etc.]
Interesting comment. On balance I would say that it is true for fixed partner divisions (Intermediate etc).ducasi wrote:However, generally, if you want to do well in a competition, deciding "no dips or drops" is likely to limit your chances.
kiwichook wrote:... The part I'm interested in is hearing peoples thoughts on tactics some people out there use to win these sorts of division in comps, "fair" or "unfair" within the rules of course.
robd wrote: I do know there are people who will not enter DWAS comps in case they get a really good partner and disappoint them and I think this is a real shame.
that would be because you are a delight to dance with GaryGary wrote:It sounds like the Aussie DWAS comps run a little differently than in the UK. Generally you meet your partner for the first time on the stage, a few seconds before the music starts. Even so, I usually try to ask the girl if there's anything she particularly wants or doesn't want me to lead. I guess that would help us both (guys/girls are also judged individually, at least at first) to compete better, but mainly I ask so that the girl can have a better time. Usually the answer is "meh, lead whatever" anyway.
Depends on the format...kiwichook wrote:Probably a ridiculous thread to start but very curious to hear what people think about the girls telling the guys competing in that section beforehand on the day or even as they get to them on the floor, not to put them into certain moves. Could be for any any number of reasons why, for example because they can't do the more difficult moves like a big drop or they don't like certain moves. All done of course to improve their chances of winning an Advanced section placing. At that level, is it either pathetic or is it very clever to work in this cunning and calcuated way? Or is it just plain good dancing tactics ensuring one plays to their strengths? Thoughts?![]()
Is the Toe Dip an official Ceroc move? And why will there be water on the dance floor? And can I pre-book you for a dance at Blackpool?Trouble wrote:DTS and I have entered Blackpool DWAS. We are doing it to dip our toes in the water if you like as competing is at the back of our minds maybe for next year.![]()
In our case it would be switch partners every 40 seconds.Martin wrote:Depends on the format...
Do you stay with the same partner throughout and get a few minutes to chat before hand.
Do you switch partners every 40 seconds.
ducasi wrote:While drops are probably not essential to winning a DWAS competition, I'd suggest that if you really don't want to do them in such a competition, you'd be better not entering at all.
.
Let me see if I understand this right:kiwichook wrote:You quickly tell the guys what you won't do and then when the brave guy tries to do a move you don't want because he thinks to himself what a ridiculous thing to say at an Advanced level...
what...?? But the drop doesn't happen! As I said, follower blocks, so there is no danger then, is there. And anyway, surely, no one sets out to be dangerous in front of a crowd, or a judge do they?? One way to make oneself look really bad???. So wot's your point??MartinHarper wrote:Let me see if I understand this right:
Follower says "no drops, please".
Leader leads a drop anyway.
That sounds... dangerous.
kiwichook wrote:In our case it would be switch partners every 40 seconds.
So, once on the floor, you quickly tell the guys what you won't do and then when the brave guy tries to do a move you don't want because he thinks to himself what a ridiculous thing to say at an Advanced level, you then resort to blocking him with your "body" so you can then successfully lead them into another move to make yourself look good! By then, you should have successfully worked your way round making sure you leave all the male participants on the floor looking like stunned mullets. And to finish off, it then becomes an "Andy and Lou fist waving" moment when you get awarded first prize for your sterling efforts![]()
![]()
Basic dance etiquette is that no means no. The "brave" leader in your example should go back and work on his basics.kiwichook wrote:What's your point?
That's like driving 2ft behind a car on a motorway, on the theory that they won't slam on their breaks, so there's no danger.kiwichook wrote:what...?? But the drop doesn't happen! As I said, follower blocks, so there is no danger then, is there.
Very few drivers "set out" to have an accident either, to continue my vehicle analogy. But it still happens.kiwichook wrote:And anyway, surely, no one sets out to be dangerous in front of a crowd, or a judge do they?? One way to make oneself look really bad???. So wot's your point??![]()