oh, really ?Paul F wrote: IF, and this is a huge IF, it was scientifically possible to find 2 people that, on a physiological and mental level, were an identical person (learning experiences, physical abilities, fitness etc etc) and the only thing that differs is that one of them has done MJ for 5 years or so then, and only then, would I say that it would maybe be slightly easier for the MJ'er.
One for the veterans: Is WCS going the way of Lindy ?
- Caro
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2781
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:39 pm
Re: One for the veterans: Is WCS going the way of Lindy ?
Little Miss Whipme
- Paul F
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2408
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2003 12:00 pm
Re: One for the veterans: Is WCS going the way of Lindy ?
But this would never happen.Caro wrote:oh, really ?![]()
![]()
How good was the MJer?
What habits did they have?
Did they pay attention during their MJ classes?
There are just too many variables to classify MJ vs NON MJ. Some freak of science comparison of identical person vs identical person, yes
- David Bailey
- Senior Member
- Posts: 17001
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 12:00 pm
Re: One for the veterans: Is WCS going the way of Lindy ?
Yes, that's my opinion too.Caro wrote:So, again to clarify, my opinion is that MJ-ers, with the good and bad apples, are easier to teach WCS than complete beginners, with the (same - except for the intermediate know-it-all who will only materialise in this group after a few lessons) good and bad apples.
But that's not what you said - you said:
Can you possibly believe it now?Caro wrote:I can't possibly believe that complete beginners who have no dance background whatsoever would be easier to teach than MJ-ers.
I'm not asking you to believe it, I'm just asking you not to dismiss someone's opinion as "impossible to believe".
"if your arguments are poorly constructed, they are often misinterperetated" - CJ
- Caro
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2781
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:39 pm
Re: One for the veterans: Is WCS going the way of Lindy ?
oh for Christ sake I'm not making my point that ambiguously !David Bailey wrote: Can you possibly believe it now?
I'm not asking you to believe it, I'm just asking you not to dismiss someone's opinion as "impossible to believe".
I can believe one particular individual beginner might be easier to teach than one particular MJ-er.
I believe a random group (if there was such a thing) of a sufficient size of MJ-ers would be easier to teach than a random group of a sufficient size of beginners. Therefore I disagree with the oppposite stance (Mike's) until I read convincing enough arguments to change my mind.
clear now ?
Little Miss Whipme
- David Bailey
- Senior Member
- Posts: 17001
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 12:00 pm
Re: One for the veterans: Is WCS going the way of Lindy ?
As ifCaro wrote:oh for Christ sake I'm not making my point that ambiguously !![]()
Let me try to make my point with equal clarity.
Stating that a person's opinion is "ridiculous", or "inconceivable", just because you happen to disagree with that opinion, is unreasonable.
"if your arguments are poorly constructed, they are often misinterperetated" - CJ
- Martin
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2345
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2003 7:29 am
Re: One for the veterans: Is WCS going the way of Lindy ?
David Bailey wrote:As if
Let me try to make my point with equal clarity.
Stating that a person's opinion is "ridiculous", or "inconceivable", just because you happen to disagree with that opinion, is unreasonable.
Now David, don't be so ridiculous...
-
bigdjiver
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4899
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 1:38 am
- Contact:
Re: One for the veterans: Is WCS going the way of Lindy ?
- JiveLad
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2388
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 10:59 am
- Contact:
Re: One for the veterans: Is WCS going the way of Lindy ?
David Bailey wrote:As if
Let me try to make my point with equal clarity.
Stating that a person's opinion is "ridiculous", or "inconceivable", just because you happen to disagree with that opinion, is unreasonable.
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man."
George Bernard Shaw
- Minnie M
- Senior Member
- Posts: 7924
- Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 11:00 am
Re: One for the veterans: Is WCS going the way of Lindy ?
Unfortunately many MJ dancers do not know the difference when they first learn, thus making them harder to teach than complete novices. It was certainly the hardest thing for me to get into my head when I first learnt.
However, on the plus side, at least they are half way there !
Back on thread track - In the days when some MJ dancers moved over to Lindy, the popular style in those days was Savoy, knees bent, relax body (even bum sticking out with some guys) etc., thus making it much more difficult for the some MJ to grasp PLUS the fast swing music didn't help
At least with WCS most of the music lends itself to both styles
--ooOoo--
Age is a question of mind over matter, if you don't mind, it doesn't matter
Leroy (Satchel) Paige (1906-1982)
Mickey Mouse's girlfriend, Minnie, made her film debut, along with Mickey, in "Steamboat Willie" on November 18, 1928.
That date is recognized as her official birthday.
-
TA Guy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 873
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 11:12 pm
Re: One for the veterans: Is WCS going the way of Lindy ?
Anyone who has danced with first timers in MJ beginner classes knows exactly what problems that group of people 'off the street' being to learning to dance.
I just find it bizarre someone could argue they are easier to teach WCS to than a group of more experienced MJ'ers.
I mean, I realize bad habits are sometimes harder to undo than learning from scratch, but even so.... given that, it might help to hear what 'bad habits' we're talking about... ?
- NZ Monkey
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1109
- Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 10:15 am
Re: One for the veterans: Is WCS going the way of Lindy ?
I defend his right to say it too - I just don't think actually doing so is advisable in this situation.David Bailey wrote: No, I'm just saying that it's a point of view - in fact, I don't agree with it, I personally think the advantages outweigh the problems - but I defend Mikey's right to say it.
- Caro
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2781
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:39 pm
Re: One for the veterans: Is WCS going the way of Lindy ?
Now, really, show me where I have actually qualified Mike's opinion as 'ridiculous' or 'inconceivable'. I said 'I can't possibly imagine why' (hence opening the door for Mike to present his arguments), i.e. I am stating my opinion and not making any sweeping statement or trying to qualify Mike's opinion in any way.David Bailey wrote: Stating that a person's opinion is "ridiculous", or "inconceivable", just because you happen to disagree with that opinion, is unreasonable.
So not only you got a PhD in splitting hairs, you're now also either manipulating my posts or making a point being particularly obtuse ? Not sure which one I prefer
Little Miss Whipme
- David Bailey
- Senior Member
- Posts: 17001
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 12:00 pm
Re: One for the veterans: Is WCS going the way of Lindy ?
To which I can only answerCaro wrote:Now, really, show me where I have actually qualified Mike's opinion as 'ridiculous' or 'inconceivable'. I said 'I can't possibly imagine why' (hence opening the door for Mike to present his arguments), i.e. I am stating my opinion and not making any sweeping statement or trying to qualify Mike's opinion in any way.
So not only you got a PhD in splitting hairs, you're now also either manipulating my posts or making a point being particularly obtuse ? Not sure which one I prefer![]()
"if your arguments are poorly constructed, they are often misinterperetated" - CJ
- Caro
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2781
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:39 pm
Re: One for the veterans: Is WCS going the way of Lindy ?
that's what I thought...David Bailey wrote:To which I can only answer![]()
waste of keyboard time, that's what you are
Little Miss Whipme
- David Bailey
- Senior Member
- Posts: 17001
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 12:00 pm
Re: One for the veterans: Is WCS going the way of Lindy ?
OK, seeing as you seem to want to take this OT, who am I to stop you...
No, hence closing the door, by dismissing the argument as not worth discussing.Caro wrote:Now, really, show me where I have actually qualified Mike's opinion as 'ridiculous' or 'inconceivable'. I said 'I can't possibly imagine why' (hence opening the door for Mike to present his arguments)
No, you were stating it "as fact".Caro wrote:, i.e. I am stating my opinion and not making any sweeping statement or trying to qualify Mike's opinion in any way.
If you'd said "How can it possibly be that...?", that would be opening the door. You didn't state that, so you weren't.
Here's a suggestion - let's avoid the the abuse, huh?Caro wrote:So not only you got a PhD in splitting hairs, you're now also either manipulating my posts or making a point being particularly obtuse ? Not sure which one I prefer![]()
"if your arguments are poorly constructed, they are often misinterperetated" - CJ
- Caro
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2781
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:39 pm
Re: One for the veterans: Is WCS going the way of Lindy ?
David Bailey wrote: No, you were stating it "as fact".
Let me single out the relevant bits in my previous posts, in case you were reading something else altogether...
Caro wrote:I can't possibly believe...
...
but I can't imagine they would...
... I can understand MJ-ers might be the more demanding pupils...
Caro wrote:And I say this is a stretch that I can't imagine being true
...
I suggest you leave MikeyR clarify his position- it would in fact be interesting to hear what in his teacher experience makes MJ-ers so hard to teach (Mike?).
Caro wrote: ...there are disadvantages in learning MJ then WCS - I just don't think they're anywhere as numerous or serious as learning WCS out of the blue.
...
So, again to clarify, my opinion is ...
Where are the facts instead of the opinions and the qualifying of Mike's comment as ridiculous exactly ?Caro wrote: Therefore I disagree with the oppposite stance (Mike's) until I read convincing enough arguments to change my mind.
As for the obtuse comment I would have thought it clear that I was expressing surprise and looking for unexpected explanations, having never thought of you that way through this forum. Hence my total incomprehension as to why you've decided to make me say things I haven't - if I could think of a sensible reason why, I'd say you're trying to wind me up, or trying to get Mike and I to have a popcorn moment, which I am not interested in having.
So who's abusing who exactly ?
I'll leave that utterly sterile conversation with you right now - I'm not interested in proving any further that you are, deliberately or not, misreading and trying to manipulate my posts for what I can only imagine be the sake of entertainment. Hope you had fun
However, Mike, I'm still genuinely interested to read about your experience with teaching MJ-ers.
Little Miss Whipme
- fletch
- Senior Member
- Posts: 9298
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 1:47 pm
Re: One for the veterans: Is WCS going the way of Lindy ?
'H' cums to mindMinnie M wrote:
(even bum sticking out with some guys)![]()
sorry back to the serious stuff, I driffed off, are we up to 6 yet
1 and 2 and 3 and 4 and 5 and 6
a question ? i'm quitte good a multi tasking but I find it hard to count and ask my lead where and how long they have been dancing, there name, boy's girl's or both
1&2&3&4&5&6
lalalalalala
-
mikeyr
- Senior Member
- Posts: 507
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 11:00 am
Re: One for the veterans: Is WCS going the way of Lindy ?
Sorry for not being around to take part in this "discussion".David Bailey wrote:What, you think AT-ers are less exclusive? Rubbish, they're much more snooty than any wussy friendly cuddly WCS scene could ever be, believe me.
MikeyR wasn't saying "I hate MJers", he was just expressing his honest opinion about some difficulties he was having teaching MJers. Now, this may reflect his teaching approach, it may reflect genuine objective problems in "transitioning", or it may be plain wrong.
But I'd rather he expressed an opinion which we can debate, instead of being jumped-on for daring to say something not entirely fluffy and positive.
And this isn't a forum for promoting WCS events - although sometimes that's difficult to remember. So "being diplomatic" is not required.
Firstly, I want to say that I came to WCS from Modern Jive which I danced for 5 or 6 years and albeit some time ago now, a couple of years that time was teaching regular classes and workshops.
How Long have I been dancing WCS, as a Leader 10 mths as a follower 2 mths. I have been involved with teaching the basics of WCS for about 5 months (because people have asked me to).
What is the objective of the Trent Park venue - To provide a friendly, nuturing atmosphere in which to Learn to dance WCS(But not in one evening).
My crime? To venture that opinion MJers are harder to teach WSC to than non dancers? Or to write and submit a post that was a little too generalised ? I will let the reader make up there own mind.
Before I try to qualify my opinion, I will do a little Pop Quiz. Is there anyone out there in Forumland that either runs a WCS venue, teaches at a WCS venue or frequents a regular WCS class that has ever seen me sit out or not partake in, a beginners lesson at a class or workshop weekend ?
Why ? Well I will let you make your own mind up on that too!
To qualify my opinion. It is based, purely on my limited experience! But could it be that because my years doing MJ and my transition gives me a little better understanding of the problems?
Also as with MJ learning it and teaching it are not the same thing. it seems to me that a lot of those comments are coming from those who learn. In theory, Yes I agree somebody with dance experience should be easier to teach, not necessarily bourne out in practise.
If I was to venture a reason, I would suggest attitude more than anything else. Why? Again IMHO MJ has sold well because it easy to learn to do(though not all do, do they?) and provides a large social element, the basics are very basic and to progress above the "Intermediate" really one must search out themselves.
WCS, just like many other dances, is not easy to learn and even harder to perfect. Iam sure those other dances just like WCS get their fair share MJers who turn up and get frustrated because it is just not as easy. It is fact that whilst WCS is largely very different, some of the patterns look very similar, the music that is used in the dance is used in MJ, which seems to lead most people to think they can pick it up just as easily. The non dancers
who come back on a regular basis seem to pick it up quicker, that has been my experience!
It is a major part of Trent Parks mission Statement to provide a positive friendly environment in which to learn this dance because not everybody learns at the same pace and we believe the learning process should be a positive one.
I understand that most people on here have never met me and so a post on here is how you will judge me! But to those that have met me, danced either MJ or WCS with me, do you really think I have an elitist attitude about WCS?
- Maxine
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3896
- Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 3:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: One for the veterans: Is WCS going the way of Lindy ?
mikeyr wrote:
I understand that most people on here have never met me and so a post on here is how you will judge me! But to those that have met me, danced either MJ or WCS with me, do you really think I have an elitist attitude about WCS?
You notice I qualified that comment
![]()
![]()
I have been to about 5 lessons at Trent Park. Mike has been really encouraging, helpful and very welcoming, although I’m not sure if he is smiling when he dances with me or grimacing. I have been very surprised by how hard I have found it and the worst part is being a beginner again and the feeling of complete ineptness
-
Amir
- Senior Member
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 12:00 pm
Re: One for the veterans: Is WCS going the way of Lindy ?
The second time I learnt another language I simply accepted that every language has its own idyosyncracies, and got on with learning it. I'll still have chuckle about things that seem weird to me (like that in French to say '95' you have to say 'four twenties and fifteen') but then I just accept it. I'm also confident that eventually I'll be as fluent as I need to be, and am patient with myself.
I know lindy hop teachers who have also said they notice Modern Jivers take longer to learn than non-dancers. I think its a similar case of questioning and frustration that holds them back. The good thing is, it doesn't have to. If you assume that your modern jive won't help you, ironically it might. Otherwise, it seems in some cases to actually get in the way.
But the single biggest reason that stops modern jivers from getting good at wcs has nothing to do with technique or bad habits. And sadly, it often happens with those that show a lot of potential.
They give up.