Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 46

Thread: A musicality spin-off

  1. #21
    Registered User NZ Monkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Auckland, NZ
    Posts
    1,109
    Rep Power
    9

    Re: A musicality spin-off

    Quote Originally Posted by Lory View Post
    Once you've got to grips with the tripling and such like, you suddenly find the rock step, plod plod, plod plod, steps of MJ more limiting, than the infinite variations of footwork patterns available to you in WCS
    Quote Originally Posted by Lou
    Only if you've been grounded in the RLRLRLRL "walking" footwork...
    I think this is something of an implied restriction to be honest.

    Many good MJ dancers insist, quite correctly, that you don't have to step once on every beat, but every class I've seen has taught moves that way if they bother mentioning the footwork at all. It's what the overwhelming majority of MJ dancers (if they're on-beat at all anyway )and teachers do.

    In my experience varying from that rhythm tends to distract your partner because you're not doing what they expect. Even if the lead is still fine the whole way if find they tend to worry through the dance rather than just enjoy it. The alternative then is to tone it down and "plod" away in a limited way for your partners benefit, which is limiting if you feel inclined to do something else to the music.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ducasi
    WCS has rules that MJ doesn't have, therefore MJ has more scope to "do interesting things and movements".
    I think this is cop out argument.

    In one sense it's true in that without any rules to adhere to anything is possible. In a practical sense though I think it's wash. Firstly, there is enough variety in options open within the rule sets of more strictly defined dances that I don't believe the limitations provide a ceiling to musical interpretation for any individual to hit in their lifetime. Secondly, the existence of rules may rule out some moves or techniques - but they also enable others. I can't lead tick-tock footwork on my follower for instance if they don't anchor step with a triple.

    In addition to that, despite having the ability to lead anything at all in MJ, the technique from both dancers that is required to do so is in many cases non-existent. Dancers with highly developed lead/follow skills in the MJ world are vanishingly rare and teachers even rarer. Those who do demonstrate that ability have almost invariably learned their skills elsewhere before starting MJ. While it's possible to have good technique and rubbish musical interpretation in a partnered dance, it's very difficult to have good musical interpretation (that makes sense to anyone outside your own mind anyway... ) with rubbish technique.

    To be entirely fair that last paragraph isn't a criticism of MJ as a dance form itself - but one of the business model. The catch is that the two are so closely aligned in this case that I don't think it's possible to separate them for practical purposes. In order to reverse the situation* most of the teachers would need to be extensively re-trained or discarded entirely which wouldn't be good for business.

    *I'd rather someone started another thread or resurrected an old one if they want to debate about whether we should even want to do so as I think it'll just derail any conversation about musicality. I'm well aware there are good arguments about why people wouldn't want change

  2. #22
    Registered User Lynn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Belfast
    Posts
    8,925
    Rep Power
    15

    Re: A musicality spin-off

    Quote Originally Posted by CheesyRobMan View Post
    This is something I've really noticed since I started learning to follow - the speed of a spin/turn is important.
    And you have to decide fast! I tend to decide to do a double spin partway through the first spin based on how fast I am going and what the music is doing. Sometimes I get it wrong and end up half a beat behind :shrug: - but its fab when the timing is perfect.

    Quote Originally Posted by CheesyRobMan View Post
    If you go round too fast you're just left standing there like a lemon for half a beat which looks and feels rubbish, and breaks up whatever flow you've achieved until that point.
    Naw, just wiggle...

  3. #23
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    London & environs'
    Posts
    3,938
    Rep Power
    9

    Re: A musicality spin-off

    Quote Originally Posted by dep View Post
    I let my partner spin/turn as fast as she wants. If her completion does not coincide with a half beat then we use the pause to effect and start together when it's right.
    The biggest problem I have, as a leader, is recognising within the first one eighth of the Followers turn, at what speed she requires me to lead her through the remainder of the turn. Every Follower turns at different speeds and varies their turn speed with the music. I try to "follow" her, by allowing her (in effect leading) to turn at her chosen speed.
    It is possible for the lead to "set up" how fast or slow he want s the follow to spin.

    For instance when leading the ceroc spin, the lead can use a little force for a slow spin, a bit more for a medium speed spin and more force for a fast spin.

    The lead can even control how many spins the follow will end up doing.

    I'm not a lead, so can't explain it well, but it's physics. Force and motion? Centifugial force.
    Last edited by Astro; 19th-May-2008 at 11:52 AM.

  4. #24
    Basically lazy robd's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Nr Cambridge
    Posts
    3,696
    Rep Power
    12

    Re: A musicality spin-off

    I think on a 'free' spin it should be entirely up to the follower how fast/slow she spins and how many spins that involves. For me as leader all I expect is that she be ready to be led again in time with the music - spins that finish slightly behind the beat (or too far ahead of it come to that) are incredibly frustrating for the leader (well, for me they are).

  5. #25
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Zurich
    Posts
    1,060
    Rep Power
    11

    Re: A musicality spin-off

    Quote Originally Posted by Astro View Post
    It is possible for the lead to "set up" how fast or slow he want s the follow to spin.

    For instance when leading the ceroc spin, the lead can use a little force for a slow spin, a bit more for a medium speed spin and more force for a fast spin.

    The lead can even control how many spins the follow will end up doing.
    I appreciate it when a follower allows me to lead the degree of turn or spin that I want in order to fit the move that I desire or the musicality.

    I often want to lead the follower to do only half a turn as I rotate by a half turn to collect her. I also use a rotating manhattan with and outside turn for the follower so that I can collect her smoothly and carry on dancing. These things (and many others) just don't work if a follower takes any lead to turn as and opportunity to go into high speed multiple turns.

    Obviously the followers high speed/multiple turns will work in their own right but they are not what I was expecting because that was not what I led. Whenever I get something that is not what I led then I have to very quickly come up with a repsonse to it.

    If the follower spins faster and finishes ahead of the beat then I have to insert a small delay to lead her again on the beat. It can look like there is a constant stutter in the dance. If she does multiple spins that I did not lead then have to abort my plans to collect her for fear of knocking her off balance while she still has too much rotational momentum. I have to keep out of the way until she slows down enough to collect.

    Kyle Redd and Sarah Vann Drake have a saying "surprise your audience, not your partner". They want you to lead smoothly and in sufficient time that your partner is not having to guess your intentions. If there was a similar one for follows it might be "follow only what is led". If I want you to spin fast/multiple I will give you the lead for it. If I lead you slow it is because I want you to turn slowly. Trust me - I have a better idea of what is coming next than you do. Of course when I am not leading you are open to do what you want as long as you understand that I will want to start leading again at a suitable point.

  6. #26
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    196
    Rep Power
    9

    Re: A musicality spin-off

    Quote Originally Posted by Chef View Post
    Kyle Redd and Sarah Vann Drake have a saying "surprise your audience, not your partner".
    This couldn't help but remind me of a I watched last night. As good as the lead is, I love what Tatiana makes of his plans to freeze on the 1.07 break And while we're on the subject of musicality

  7. #27
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Zurich
    Posts
    1,060
    Rep Power
    11

    Re: A musicality spin-off

    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisB View Post
    This couldn't help but remind me of a I watched last night. As good as the lead is, I love what Tatiana makes of his plans to freeze on the 1.07 break And while we're on the subject of musicality
    Quite a nice example. They have both acknowledged the presence of the break. It doesn't mean that both of you have to freeze like statues for the duration of the break. One, or both of you can "do stuff" but be in a position to restart together at the end of the break.

    In the break at 1:07 in the video he may have been intending to lead something during the break but Tatiana has started doing her thing early enough to let the leader know that he should not lead anything but be a stationary support. She is done in good time for him to be able to lead after the break.

    What she could not have done is to wait until he leads something and then pull him back so that she could do what she wants.

    While a lot of us would love to have the musicality of Jordan and Tatiana (or a number of others) most of us are looking for a starting point to start exploring musicality in our dancing. I applaud lost leaders post for giving a lot of really good advice to those people that want to make a start, without being so nit picky that it puts people off.

    Musicality is made much easier with connection between the partners, and both partner connected to the music. If the follower is not allowing the leader to lead then the leader doesn't grow to understand what they need to do in order to really lead. If the leader doesn't provide a good clear lead the followers stop trusting them. As followers and leaders we can only grow with the help of each other. Trust them when they are getting it right and understanding and patience when they are not.

  8. #28
    Registered User Lynn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Belfast
    Posts
    8,925
    Rep Power
    15

    Re: A musicality spin-off

    Quote Originally Posted by robd View Post
    I think on a 'free' spin it should be entirely up to the follower how fast/slow she spins and how many spins that involves.
    Quote Originally Posted by Chef View Post
    If there was a similar one for follows it might be "follow only what is led". If I want you to spin fast/multiple I will give you the lead for it. If I lead you slow it is because I want you to turn slowly.
    Shows the contrast in approach from leaders on this. Or does it? I'm not sure if you are referring to 'spins' as in free spins or 'turns/assisted spins'. I can't think of any reason why a follower would fight against the speed of lead on an assisted spin so you must be talking about free spins?

    Personally I find multiple (free) spins an opportunity for me to have some input into the dance and I take responsibility of getting round on the beat and in time for the leader to collect. I don't always get it right but then leaders don't always get things right either.

    I really hate it when an inexperienced lead tries to make me do multiple spins, they think if they push harder that gives me more momentum to get round more than once, they don't realise it usually just pushes me off balance.

  9. #29
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Zurich
    Posts
    1,060
    Rep Power
    11

    Re: A musicality spin-off

    Quote Originally Posted by Lynn View Post
    Shows the contrast in approach from leaders on this. Or does it? I'm not sure if you are referring to 'spins' as in free spins or 'turns/assisted spins'. I can't think of any reason why a follower would fight against the speed of lead on an assisted spin so you must be talking about free spins?

    Personally I find multiple (free) spins an opportunity for me to have some input into the dance and I take responsibility of getting round on the beat and in time for the leader to collect. I don't always get it right but then leaders don't always get things right either.

    I really hate it when an inexperienced lead tries to make me do multiple spins, they think if they push harder that gives me more momentum to get round more than once, they don't realise it usually just pushes me off balance.
    I feel the same way about it whether it is a free spin or not. If I get something different from what I lead then it surprises me and I have to think of a way to cope with that - in the same way that followers don't like it when leaders spend an awful lot of time trying to catch their followers out. Setting your partner up for a fall is not what dancing is about for me, and that applies to leaders and followers IMHO. Others may like it but it is not my cup of tea.

    I know it is very irksome when inexperienced leaders try to get you to do multiple spins and just put too much energy into the lead, and apply it too sharply. But the key point is that they are inexperienced. They have mostly been dancing with inexperienced followers and have come away with the feeling that most of them have their feet stuck to the floor with glue. So the only way to get most of the people that they dance with to spin is to launch them into orbit.

    Most men don't spin themselves so they don't understand how delicate the balance required is. They don't understand that most of the energy needed is to start the spin and very little extra energy is needed for multiple spins. They don't understand that the energy needs to be applied smoothly and constantly in a circle around the follows central axis. If you want to spin up a childrens playground merry-go-round a bit of force, applied evenly, around the direction of travel is far more effective than hitting it with a sledgehammer.

    They are inexperienced. Understanding why they don't understand and patience in helping them understand will nurture them along. Very few people dance badly because they want to.

  10. #30
    Registered User Lynn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Belfast
    Posts
    8,925
    Rep Power
    15

    Re: A musicality spin-off

    Quote Originally Posted by Chef View Post
    I feel the same way about it whether it is a free spin or not. If I get something different from what I lead then it surprises me and I have to think of a way to cope with that - in the same way that followers don't like it when leaders spend an awful lot of time trying to catch their followers out. Setting your partner up for a fall is not what dancing is about for me, and that applies to leaders and followers IMHO. Others may like it but it is not my cup of tea.
    Yep, a dance consisting of lots of complicated moves feels very much like 'try to catch the follower out' - but I wouldn't have thought a follower doing a multiple spin, or slowing down part of a return to match music with a fast snap around for the last part is 'setting your partner up for a fall' when they aren't affecting the timing of the dance.

    Quote Originally Posted by Chef View Post
    They are inexperienced. Understanding why they don't understand and patience in helping them understand will nurture them along. Very few people dance badly because they want to.
    I spend a lot of time and patience trying to help nurture less experienced leads. But how exactly does a lead learn to lead a multiple free spin? Who shows them this? How did you learn it?

    I can't think of any occasion where I have been 'led' to do multiple free spins, its always been a snap decision based on the music and whether two spins will 'fit', and how fast I am going which usually has more to do with the shoe/floor combo than any momentum generated by the lead.

    I think it can be 'invited' but I'd really rather it was something the lead let me decide.

  11. #31
    Lovely Moderator ducasi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    10,015
    Rep Power
    14

    Re: A musicality spin-off

    I always welcome my followers doing multiple spins when it adds something musically to the dance, or doesn't affect the overall timing too much.

    Inexperienced followers may sometimes do multiple spins which breaks the rhythm of the dance. I am patient with them, as they may still be learning how to best use their spinning ability.
    Let your mind go and your body will follow. – Steve Martin, LA Story

  12. #32
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Zurich
    Posts
    1,060
    Rep Power
    11

    Re: A musicality spin-off

    Quote Originally Posted by Lynn View Post
    Yep, a dance consisting of lots of complicated moves feels very much like 'try to catch the follower out' - but I wouldn't have thought a follower doing a multiple spin, or slowing down part of a return to match music with a fast snap around for the last part is 'setting your partner up for a fall' when they aren't affecting the timing of the dance..
    I think the key part of what you said was "when they aren't affecting the timing of the dance". I would add to that that I would like them to finish on balance, in control of themselves and preferably in the same place as they started. I know we all have off nights but some people seem to want to try to run before they can walk. People that try 3-4 spins while travelling across the floor scattering other dancers from their path and then need my intervention to prevent them from hitting the floor when it was obvious that they were in trouble before the end of the first spin - they affect the timing of the dance.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lynn View Post
    I spend a lot of time and patience trying to help nurture less experienced leads. But how exactly does a lead learn to lead a multiple free spin? Who shows them this? How did you learn it?.
    I learnt it from Nina Daines. She does an excellant class on spinning (in fact all her classes are excellant). She made the men and women all do the same excercises to show them how the balance is achieved, how delicate the balance is, how to apply the lead in an arc like tracing a hula hoop centred on your partner, and how to apply it evenly without any power surges that will disturb your partners balance. She also taught the followers how having a floppy arm stopped the transfer of power to the follower and how this might encourage men to use too much power in an effort to get enough transferred.

    Most men learn with followers who spin badly and have floppy arms. Then they dance with you and treat you as if you are the same. Result - misery for you.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lynn View Post
    I can't think of any occasion where I have been 'led' to do multiple free spins, its always been a snap decision based on the music and whether two spins will 'fit', and how fast I am going which usually has more to do with the shoe/floor combo than any momentum generated by the lead.

    I think it can be 'invited' but I'd really rather it was something the lead let me decide.
    Well I make a snap decision based on the music and wether two spins will fit and provide the lead for it. If I was leading you into a free spin and was planning to do a mirror of your spin myself and collect in open first move position, if Iwas going to do a double spin I would lead the follwer into a double spin just for the sake of symmetry and so we looked like we were dancing together. It is about wether you really trust your leader to deliver you to the music.

    Quote Originally Posted by ducasi View Post
    I always welcome my followers doing multiple spins when it adds something musically to the dance, or doesn't affect the overall timing too much.

    Inexperienced followers may sometimes do multiple spins which breaks the rhythm of the dance. I am patient with them, as they may still be learning how to best use their spinning ability.
    Everybody needs a playground to learn in and we must give each other space to play and through that, understand. When people learn drops they put them in everywhere. When they get more experienced they use them sparingly and where appropriate in the music. The early part of learning seems to be centred on the mechanics and the latter part on the context and presentation of a move. It is the natural order of learning.

  13. #33
    Registered User Lynn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Belfast
    Posts
    8,925
    Rep Power
    15

    Re: A musicality spin-off

    Quote Originally Posted by Chef View Post
    I think the key part of what you said was "when they aren't affecting the timing of the dance". I would add to that that I would like them to finish on balance, in control of themselves and preferably in the same place as they started. I know we all have off nights but some people seem to want to try to run before they can walk.
    First multiple spin I did was in Britrock int comp - Andy McG was doing multiple spins, I had to keep up!

    My spinning varies so much - on my footwear, floor, my balance, how I'm feeling, what sort of dancing I've been doing etc. Sometimes I feel I am dancing really badly - but spinning well (bizzare I know!). I know I can do perfectly timed, fast double spins, controlled and on the spot and be on beat ready for the lead. But I don't know till I try whether I can do them on any given night!

    Its funny that we don't have more teaching on how to lead and follow spins, given that they are a regular feature of the dance. I've done a private on spinning technique at a weekender and there was a useful workshop on travelling spins at Blaze but it tends to get mentioned in passing, just about, in regular classes.

  14. #34
    Commercial Operator
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Fife.
    Posts
    5,701
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: A musicality spin-off

    All of which brings us back on topic...

    Musicality spin off:

    MJ picks a represntative: WCS picks a representative.

    They spin at different times to different pieces of music and the audience judges who is more musical.

    For MJ, I propose Jamie "Peter Pan" Storey.

  15. #35
    Registered User NZ Monkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Auckland, NZ
    Posts
    1,109
    Rep Power
    9

    Re: A musicality spin-off

    Quote Originally Posted by CJ View Post
    All of which brings us back on topic...

    Musicality spin off:

    MJ picks a represntative: WCS picks a representative.

    They spin at different times to different pieces of music and the audience judges who is more musical.

    For MJ, I propose Jamie "Peter Pan" Storey.
    For WCS I propose Lee Easton. I watched perform something around the mid 20's unassisted pirouettes before a Twickenham class once. He was doing flash flicky stuff with the spare leg the whole way through....

  16. #36
    Commercial Operator
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Fife.
    Posts
    5,701
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: A musicality spin-off

    Quote Originally Posted by NZ Monkey View Post
    He was doing flash flicky stuff with the spare leg the whole way through....
    Ahhhhhhhhh, but was it musical??

  17. #37
    Registered User NZ Monkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Auckland, NZ
    Posts
    1,109
    Rep Power
    9

    Re: A musicality spin-off

    Quote Originally Posted by CJ View Post
    Ahhhhhhhhh, but was it musical??
    Possibly. At least if you consider it a worthy interpretation of a lack of music. I wasn't going to argue.

  18. #38
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Worcester, UK
    Posts
    4,157
    Rep Power
    12

    Re: A musicality spin-off

    Quote Originally Posted by ducasi View Post
    WCS has rules that MJ doesn't have, therefore MJ has more scope to "do interesting things and movements".
    A number of times you have made statements about West Coast "rules" that contradict my experience of West Coast, and the experience of other West Coast dancers. Typically they are more like guidelines or descriptions of beginner West Coast than actual rules. I think this may be distorting your judgement of the relative freedom of Modern Jive and West Coast.

    Quote Originally Posted by ducasi View Post
    In MJ, you don't need to worry about where you are in the "pattern", as you don't need to finish the pattern – at all!
    As Lori explains, I don't have to finish a pattern in West Coast either. In practice, I don't do one-move-dances in either dance.

    Quote Originally Posted by ducasi View Post
    In WCS, every pattern has at the start and end an anchor. In MJ we *normally* have a similar "step back" to build tension, but it is optional, and you can transition though a number of "patterns" without any anchor-like step-back.
    The same can be done in West Coast. If I lead my follower forwards on the "6" of a six-beat pattern, she should follow that, turning her anchor step into a "back-together-forwards" triple step that transitions directly into the next move, replacing the normal "step step".

    Quote Originally Posted by ducasi View Post
    there are places in WCS where your options are much more limited – such as the step, step out of an anchor.
    There are a several things that I can lead out of an anchor in West Coast, and several things I can choose to do as a follower, depending on the lead. It doesn't have to be step, step. The first alternative I learnt was in a beginner West Coast class - tripling in place for four beats.

    ----

    There are some places I agree with ducasi, to some extent:

    Quote Originally Posted by ducasi View Post
    E.g., in Modern Jive, it is perfectly acceptable to do any number of simple cha-cha steps any time you want – though preferably when the music calls for it! In WCS if you tried that you'd no longer be doing WCS.
    I agree that Cha Cha and West Coast are different dances.
    On the other hand, Cha Cha and Modern Jive are also different dances.
    A clearer example might be rock steps in open. Modern Jive has them, right from the first class. I've not seen them in West Coast at all so far.

    Quote Originally Posted by ducasi View Post
    I can use as much variety of footwork in MJ as any WCS dancer.
    I essentially agree with this from a leader's perspective. As a follower, I find that I have slightly more footwork options in West Coast, as the underlying footwork pattern is slightly more varied.

  19. #39
    Forum Bombshell - Our Queen! Lory's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    North London
    Posts
    9,918
    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    17

    Re: A musicality spin-off

    Quote Originally Posted by MartinHarper View Post
    The same can be done in West Coast. If I lead my follower forwards on the "6" of a six-beat pattern, she should follow that, turning her anchor step into a "back-together-forwards" triple step that transitions directly into the next move, replacing the normal "step step".
    Otherwise known as a 'Coaster step'
    MODERATOR AT YOUR SERVICE
    "If you're going to do something tonight, that you know you'll be sorry for in the morning, plan a lie in." Lorraine

  20. #40
    Commercial Operator
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Back in London
    Posts
    507
    Rep Power
    11

    Re: A musicality spin-off

    Quote Originally Posted by MartinHarper View Post
    A clearer example might be rock steps in open. Modern Jive has them, right from the first class. I've not seen them in West Coast at all so far.
    Its Called a "Rock and Go" in WCS. The simple version: where the follower is led to step back on her right for "1" and then led forward to replace the weight fully on her left on "2" then the rest of the pattern as normal.

    There is more complicated version which is used to condence two 6 beat patterns into one 10 beat pattern. I would be happy to demonstrate either for you.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Musicality
    By Gadget in forum Let's talk about dance
    Replies: 100
    Last Post: 29th-May-2008, 11:24 AM
  2. Musicality backwards
    By Ghost in forum Intermediate Corner
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 21st-October-2007, 12:03 AM
  3. Happy Birthday Spin Dryer!
    By Caz in forum Happy Birthday!
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 16th-October-2007, 11:47 PM
  4. What is musicality to you how did you achieve it?
    By Mr Cool in forum Intermediate Corner
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 5th-March-2007, 09:45 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •