Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 46

Thread: Complete waste of time for the terminally bored...

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    6,709
    Rep Power
    13

    Complete waste of time for the terminally bored...

    Here is the list of 1001 books you must read before you die.

    If you can bear it, post how many of the books you have read.

    I'm at 151.


  2. #2
    Registered User jacksondonut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Milton Keynes
    Posts
    1,593
    Rep Power
    10

    Re: Complete waste of time for the terminally bored...

    Oh dear... only 21 for me I'm afraid...

    I do know that I have read 100's of books, (an avid reader, actually) though, obviously not the ones on the list.... I wonder what that means... (?)


  3. #3
    Registered User cms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    east kilbride
    Posts
    292
    Rep Power
    10

    Re: Complete waste of time for the terminally bored...

    phew!

    ive read 61 but if you included all the film/play/tv adaptations id seen that figure would be well into the 200/300s!!!

    C x

    btw my favourite on that list is jung changs wild swans - did it for my RPR in higher english and loved it!!!
    anyone else got a fovourite?
    Last edited by cms; 5th-October-2006 at 10:31 PM. Reason: forgot qn!

  4. #4
    Registered User Twirly's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    SE London
    Posts
    4,204
    Rep Power
    11

    Re: Complete waste of time for the terminally bored...

    68 from the list for me - but I was very strict and didn't include any I'd started but not finished. I can't help but wonder why those particular books...?

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    6,709
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: Complete waste of time for the terminally bored...

    Quote Originally Posted by Twirly View Post
    68 from the list for me - but I was very strict and didn't include any I'd started but not finished. I can't help but wonder why those particular books...?
    Well, clearly you can't include books you've started but not finished!! I'd get an extra 6 for all the times I've started Ulysses...

    It's just a publishing thing, sort of the book equivalent of a boy band; get half a dozen academic critics and put together a list of 1001 books so that you have a 'product' that can be sold in bookshops. (There is also a 1001 films to see and 1001 albums to hear before you die. French equivalent no doubt in the pipeline: 1001 animals to cook before you die...)

    You can argue with it too...I don't think there are enough Conrad books nor Goldings in the list, I'd argue for the inclusion of Tom Robbins (probably Another roadside attraction) and I certainly think the cut-off date should be 10 years before publication - you really can't tell any sooner than that whether a novel will have 'staying power'.

    An another note - there are a lot of bored forumites out there tonight!!!

  6. #6
    Lovely Moderator ducasi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    10,015
    Rep Power
    14

    Re: Complete waste of time for the terminally bored...

    Quote Originally Posted by Barry Shnikov View Post
    Well, clearly you can't include books you've started but not finished!! I'd get an extra 6 for all the times I've started Ulysses...
    I've read Ulysses, and that should count for at least 100 out of the 1001!

    I'm not terminally bored enough to go through the whole list tonight, but I doubt I'll have read that many...
    Let your mind go and your body will follow. – Steve Martin, LA Story

  7. #7
    Registered User Blueshoes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,428
    Rep Power
    9

    Re: Complete waste of time for the terminally bored...

    72 1/2 for me (currently reading The Hunchback of Notre Dame).

    I think the list is flawed as I couldn't help noticing there weren't any Dean Koontz books on it....

  8. #8
    Papa Smurf
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Planet Scathe
    Posts
    12,528
    Blog Entries
    6
    Rep Power
    18

    Re: Complete waste of time for the terminally bored...

    had a very quick look but i only noticed about 20 i had read better get moving huh....

    Dean Koontz ? Who is he going to replace then ? ....but wheres Barbara Cartland ?

  9. #9
    Registered User Tessalicious's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Kentish Town
    Posts
    1,650
    Rep Power
    11

    Re: Complete waste of time for the terminally bored...

    Only about 55 for me (do I get extra points for Metamorphoses in Latin and Le Petit Prince in French?) - but to be honest, if I use the majority of those I have read as an example of what most of the books on the list are like, then thanks but no thanks, I don't feel the need to bore myself stupid finishing the list.

    Don't get me wrong, there are a few good ones in there, but Tristram Shandy? Pamela? And some of the best books I've ever read, both classics and moderns, aren't on the list (or at least not that I could see). Shame, it's a nice idea, but there is a different ideal list for every individual, and that will probably be the list they complete.

  10. #10
    Lovely Moderator ducasi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    10,015
    Rep Power
    14

    Re: Complete waste of time for the terminally bored...

    Quote Originally Posted by ducasi View Post
    I've read Ulysses, and that should count for at least 100 out of the 1001!

    I'm not terminally bored enough to go through the whole list tonight, but I doubt I'll have read that many...
    OK, had a quick scan through the list... counted about 40 I'd read. As I said above, Ulysses must be worth extra points (it's a long, difficult read, but very rewarding), but Lanark should be worth even more. It's the most dull, tortuous book I've ever read.
    Let your mind go and your body will follow. – Steve Martin, LA Story

  11. #11
    An Eclectic Toaster
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    2,042
    Rep Power
    12

    Re: Complete waste of time for the terminally bored...

    Quote Originally Posted by Barry Shnikov View Post
    Here is the list of 1001 books you must read before you die.

    If you can bear it, post how many of the books you have read.

    I'm at 151.

    I only enjoy these lists to pick holes. Some authors I'd definitely consider missing(well I couldn't find them on the list):

    Chekov (can't say he's not there because he only wrote short stories - Gogol's The Nose is there)
    Roddy Doyle
    Andrei Platonov

    More personal biases: something by Robin Jenkins would have been good. Much under-rated Scottish writer, easily the match for many of those on the list. And some writers are distinctly over-represented. Douglas Adams: are both DG novels really must-reads? I love DNA's stuff but I couldn't be a****d finishing the second one. 10 Charles Dickens? 5 Orwell?

    Tried counting last night but fell asleep. Somewhere between 50-100, though if ducasi's counting Ulysses as 100, I'll count Finnegans Wake as 300 and Perec's Life:A User's Manual as 100 so that puts me over 500

    And BS's point is a good one - too early to judge most of the stuff from the past decade.

  12. #12
    Papa Smurf
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Planet Scathe
    Posts
    12,528
    Blog Entries
    6
    Rep Power
    18

    Re: Complete waste of time for the terminally bored...

    and wheres Dan Brown ?

  13. #13
    Omnipotent Moderatrix (LMC)
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Sarf East London
    Posts
    1,606
    Rep Power
    11

    Re: Complete waste of time for the terminally bored...

    Fifty six

  14. #14
    An Eclectic Toaster
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    2,042
    Rep Power
    12

    Re: Complete waste of time for the terminally bored...

    Quote Originally Posted by Barry Shnikov View Post
    Well, clearly you can't include books you've started but not finished!! I'd get an extra 6 for all the times I've started Ulysses...
    I'd hope that at least once, you skipped some middle sections and went on to the final "Penelope" section. Overall I've probably read the book twice in total, but some episodes more than others.

  15. #15
    Commercial Operator
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Northeastern Parts
    Posts
    5,221
    Rep Power
    14

    Re: Complete waste of time for the terminally bored...

    Quote Originally Posted by Dreadful Scathe View Post
    and wheres Dan Brown ?
    Bognor.

    77 for me. A lot of others that I started, and have always meant to go back to. Some odd absences as well.

  16. #16
    Omnipotent Moderatrix (LMC)
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Sarf East London
    Posts
    1,606
    Rep Power
    11

    Re: Complete waste of time for the terminally bored...

    Quote Originally Posted by Stuart M View Post
    I'd hope that at least once, you skipped some middle sections and went on to the final "Penelope" section.
    Is that the dirty bit??

  17. #17
    Registered User Beowulf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    The Beoverse
    Posts
    7,985
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: Complete waste of time for the terminally bored...

    Ok I can breathe now..

    At first.. after a quick scan I saw.. ZERO books I'd read. but after copying the list into Excel and ticking everyone I'd read line by line I can now breathe a sigh of relief and say that I've read 75 of those books. I would like to thank messers Poe, Dickens, Wells, Swift and Verne for bumping my score somewhat Very few books in the 2000's .. perhaps I should read more modern stuff

  18. #18
    An Eclectic Toaster
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    2,042
    Rep Power
    12

    Re: Complete waste of time for the terminally bored...

    Quote Originally Posted by Emma View Post
    Is that the dirty bit??
    One of them.

    Tame by later standards though. I think the censors back then had more problems with the scatological stuff much earlier on in the book.

  19. #19
    Omnipotent Moderatrix (LMC)
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Sarf East London
    Posts
    1,606
    Rep Power
    11

    Re: Complete waste of time for the terminally bored...

    Quote Originally Posted by Beowulf1970 View Post
    I would like to thank messers Poe, Dickens, Wells, Swift and Verne for bumping my score somewhat Very few books in the 2000's .. perhaps I should read more modern stuff
    It sounds as though were we to pool our resources we'd be very well read!

    I am mainly thanking Margaret Atwood, Jeanette Winterson, Hanif Kureshi and Ian McEwan for my score. And wondering at the number of books that I'd started but never finished, of course.

    Stuart - I was trying to be facetious!!

  20. #20
    The Forum Legend
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    10,672
    Rep Power
    14

    Re: Complete waste of time for the terminally bored...

    28.

    Strange, I've got a lot of books in here.... (to paraphrase)

    Guess my reading lists aren't quite the same as whoever compiled that list.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Ceroc isn't complete without ...
    By Gidders in forum Fun and Games
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 1st-August-2006, 10:01 AM
  2. Complete the following story...
    By Piglet in forum Fun and Games
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 23rd-June-2006, 01:03 PM
  3. Replies: 40
    Last Post: 20th-April-2006, 11:02 PM
  4. Post your complete limericks here
    By Baruch in forum Fun and Games
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 30th-October-2005, 02:16 AM
  5. Another waste of time...
    By DavidB in forum Fun and Games
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2nd-July-2004, 07:11 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •