Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26

Thread: How not to build a tunnel...

  1. #1
    Formerly known as DavidJames David Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Norf Lundin
    Posts
    17,001
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    18

    How not to build a tunnel...

    Pictures of the Gerrards Cross tunnel collapse here.

    So comforting to know that we entrust our lives to these people...

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    870
    Rep Power
    10

    Re: How not to build a tunnel...

    Don't know where you got those pics from DJ(M) but very interesting! The two sides of the tunnel look really badly aligned in one of thise middle pictures don't they, I wonder if those joints were properly locked before they finished construction?

    Amazing that every little scrap of land has got sufficiently valuable to make this kind of engineering viable.

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    3,166
    Rep Power
    11

    Re: How not to build a tunnel...

    My be we can persuade David Reid’s to post here

    http://www.cerocscotland.com/forum/s...7&page=2&pp=20

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    London :-)
    Posts
    2,553
    Rep Power
    11

    Re: How not to build a tunnel...

    Quote Originally Posted by JoC
    I wonder if those joints were properly locked before they finished construction?
    Does "properly locked" matter to Mr Tesco when he's assessing important decisions about where to place one of his countless new stores...

  5. #5
    Ceroc DJ
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    londonish
    Posts
    681
    Rep Power
    11

    Re: How not to build a tunnel...

    Quote Originally Posted by Pammy
    Does "properly locked" matter to Mr Tesco when he's assessing important decisions about where to place one of his countless new stores...
    Not considering the amazing 1p in every 8p in the UK is spent there.
    Makes you wonder when they'll be launching a takeover bid for The Government© and Great Britain(UK) PLC

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    London :-)
    Posts
    2,553
    Rep Power
    11

    Re: How not to build a tunnel...

    Quote Originally Posted by Robin
    Not considering the amazing 1p in every 8p in the UK is spent there.
    Makes you wonder when they'll be launching a takeover bid for The Government© and Great Britain(UK) PLC
    You mean they haven't?

    I think it's just not "public knowledge"

    Then again, we were talking about Tesco's, now if we'd said Asda's, that'd be a different kettle of fish...

  7. #7
    Registered User Ladybird's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    LeRoc-Land
    Posts
    4
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: How not to build a tunnel...

    I'm quite surprised how thin the concrete sections are, in comparison to the amount of stuff on top of them. No matter how strong arch constructions can be, surely there's got to be a "give" point when too much weight is placed on top?

    Not to mention being surprised that someone wants to photograph tunnels for a hobby (with a ladder?) for a personal website - or am I just lacking something in my life?

  8. #8
    Formerly known as DavidJames David Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Norf Lundin
    Posts
    17,001
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    18

    Re: How not to build a tunnel...

    Quote Originally Posted by Ladybird
    Not to mention being surprised that someone wants to photograph tunnels for a hobby (with a ladder?) for a personal website
    Trainspotters have their uses
    Although if I and my family were travelling through there, I might take a passing interest in the structural safety of tunnels I travelled under...

    Quote Originally Posted by Ladybird
    or am I just lacking something in my life?
    Dunno - but welcome to the Forum

  9. #9
    Registered User El Salsero Gringo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    4,881
    Rep Power
    12

    Re: How not to build a tunnel...

    Quote Originally Posted by Ladybird
    I'm quite surprised how thin the concrete sections are, in comparison to the amount of stuff on top of them. No matter how strong arch constructions can be, surely there's got to be a "give" point when too much weight is placed on top?

    Not to mention being surprised that someone wants to photograph tunnels for a hobby (with a ladder?) for a personal website - or am I just lacking something in my life?
    Arches are incredibly strong because they divert a vertical load (the weight of the material on top) sideways, loading the arch material in compression (concrete is only strong in compression) and placing a sideways load on the abutments, which consequently have to be very strong. Note the comment about a possible cause of the collapse being "insufficient side-filling before increasing the top load." Also it takes four hinge points to collapse an arch which is why arch bridges remain very stable even when the foundations shift.

  10. #10
    Registered User Ladybird's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    LeRoc-Land
    Posts
    4
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: How not to build a tunnel...

    Originally Posted by Ladybird
    Not to mention being surprised that someone wants to photograph tunnels for a hobby (with a ladder?) for a personal website
    Was meant to be a bit of a funny - didn't move on from quick post to advanced to use the smilies, which I guess I should have.

    Although if I and my family were travelling through there, I might take a passing interest in the structural safety of tunnels I travelled under...

    Good point - forgot that people generally take far more (and detailed) interest in stuff local to them/likely to impact immediately on them (not literally, I hope )

    but welcome to the Forum


    Cheers - have been "lurking" a while (read the FAQ - there's so much to learn!). Recently tried first post on Leroc-in-Bristol forum (in any forum, ever) and it went awol (after a lot of nerves/nervous energy expended), so have been "trialling" quietly here. Best trundle off to the "hello" thread next, and then see if I can get any better/more confident at it.

  11. #11
    Registered User Ladybird's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    LeRoc-Land
    Posts
    4
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: How not to build a tunnel...

    ESG - thanks. Only know a bit about arches from historical/archaoeological books/visits/documentaries. Kind of know theory (like buttresses) but they tend to use v big chunks of stone in most of the examples I've paid any attention to.

    Note the comment about a possible cause of the collapse being "insufficient side-filling before increasing the top load."
    whoops - that'll teach me to read the words as well as looking at the pics .

    Also it takes four hinge points to collapse an arch which is why arch bridges remain very stable even when the foundations shift
    don't quite understand what you mean by "hinge points"? Guess I was (in my iggerance) working on the idea of some kind of ratio that says
    x top weight > y side filling and z arch material (type/thickness) = collapse?

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    bedford
    Posts
    4,899
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: How not to build a tunnel...

    Quote Originally Posted by El Salsero Gringo
    Arches are incredibly strong because they divert a vertical load (the weight of the material on top) sideways, loading the arch material in compression (concrete is only strong in compression) and placing a sideways load on the abutments, which consequently have to be very strong. Note the comment about a possible cause of the collapse being "insufficient side-filling before increasing the top load." Also it takes four hinge points to collapse an arch which is why arch bridges remain very stable even when the foundations shift.
    Dime-store-guru mode. It seems to me that different filling materials have been used, which might allow different rates of water penetration. It is possible that a period of heavy rain could place a considerable differential stress on the tunnel.

    If there was a pressure differential between the two sides of the arch the thin female sides of the joint would be taking it all, and a diagonal crack there would force one side under the other. I did not like reading the report of the two sides being banged together. If the joint was slightly out of line and impacted it could cause such a crack. All this is idle speculation.

  13. #13
    Ceroc Franchisee & Teacher cerocmetro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    North London UK & Wellington New Zealand
    Posts
    518
    Rep Power
    11

    Re: How not to build a tunnel...

    saw this thread and fascinated by the techy talk

    But am I missing something obvious or am I just being an ex-surveyor who teaches dancing, This is not a classic arch fro two reasons, 1) it is squashed so there is a much higher loading going through the centre and not diverted down the sides and 2) I have never seen an arch that is not either a) a continuous fabrication or b) built symetrically with the loading through a centre stone.

    In this case the centre and the main focal point of the load is a join

    I am not convinced the side filling had much to do with it, but I am waiting for them to find the black box. As they say and particularly on this occasion "keep watching this space"

    Adam

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Reading
    Posts
    1,105
    Rep Power
    11

    Re: How not to build a tunnel...

    I was just looking up some train times on the National Rail enquiries website, and this is described as a "Technical Problem" on that!

  15. #15

    Re: How not to build a tunnel...

    Quote Originally Posted by cerocmetro
    saw this thread and fascinated by the techy talk

    But am I missing something obvious or am I just being an ex-surveyor who teaches dancing, This is not a classic arch fro two reasons, 1) it is squashed so there is a much higher loading going through the centre and not diverted down the sides and 2) I have never seen an arch that is not either a) a continuous fabrication or b) built symetrically with the loading through a centre stone.

    In this case the centre and the main focal point of the load is a join

    I am not convinced the side filling had much to do with it, but I am waiting for them to find the black box. As they say and particularly on this occasion "keep watching this space"

    Adam

    The design of the 'link beam' seems to allow the arch to buckle and collapse inward, I am amazed that this design ever got through the approval stages- unless it was not meant to take much loading.

    Above the 'link beam' there appears to be a reinforcing cage to form an insitu beam tying the two sections together, but it seems this has been left as exposed re-bar, not sure why that would be unless it was part of the following.

    Could it be the tunnel was intended to be covered with a heavily re-inforced ground floor slab, which meant its final loading would be minimal, but no one took account of the construction loading occurring whilst work was in progress.

    It is interesting to see the 'digger' on the tunnel roof in one picture, looking at the collapse and the minimal amount of fill on top of the tunnel I wonder if it was caused by plant & machinery working on top it.
    Point loading from a single item of plant is far far greater than evenly distributed loading over the same location.

    The fill and the cover to the tunnel roof does not seem to aid distribution of loading, I wonder if the area was zoned to avoid working directly above the tunnel
    Peter

  16. #16
    Ceroc DJ
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    londonish
    Posts
    681
    Rep Power
    11

    Re: How not to build a tunnel...

    Quote Originally Posted by Stuart
    I was just looking up some train times on the National Rail enquiries website, and this is described as a "Technical Problem" on that!
    Well its obviously a technical problem - just not one to do with trains !

  17. #17
    Registered User El Salsero Gringo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    4,881
    Rep Power
    12

    Re: How not to build a tunnel...

    Quote Originally Posted by cerocmetro
    saw this thread and fascinated by the techy talk

    But am I missing something obvious or am I just being an ex-surveyor who teaches dancing, This is not a classic arch fro two reasons, 1) it is squashed so there is a much higher loading going through the centre and not diverted down the sides and 2) I have never seen an arch that is not either a) a continuous fabrication or b) built symetrically with the loading through a centre stone.

    In this case the centre and the main focal point of the load is a join

    I am not convinced the side filling had much to do with it, but I am waiting for them to find the black box. As they say and particularly on this occasion "keep watching this space"

    Adam
    The only thing that an arch requires is that the underside of the arch remains in compression along its whole length: it can still be very flat. Brunel's 1837 bridge for the GWR across the Thames at Maidenhead has two spans of 128 feet and a rise of only 24 feet. It carries trains 10 times heavier than that for which it was designed.

    Details and pictures below are from a very good book called "Structures, or why things don't fall down" by J. E. Gordon (Penguin, 1978) which goes into a lot of detail on arches.

    Gordon also says that "if one wants to make a really thin arch - as is the custom with modern reinforced concrete bridges - then one had better get the shape just right, for there is very little room for the thrust line to wander about."

    I hope all that's of interest to someone.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  18. #18

    Re: How not to build a tunnel...

    Quote Originally Posted by El Salsero Gringo
    The only thing that an arch requires is that the underside of the arch remains in compression along its whole length:
    yup
    but if you introduce what is effectivly a 'slip joint' at the point of maximum compression, the integretry of the arch must become flawed methinks

    you would not expect to see a key stone in the centre of a flat arch would you?

  19. #19
    Registered User El Salsero Gringo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    4,881
    Rep Power
    12

    Re: How not to build a tunnel...

    Quote Originally Posted by Lounge Lizard
    you would not expect to see a key stone in the centre of a flat arch would you?
    According to Prof. Gordon, "The voussoir at the top or crown of the arch is called the keystone and is sometimes made larger than the rest. Although poets, politicians and other non-technical people have attributed special qualities to real and figurative keystones, in fact the keystone is functionally no different from all the other voussoirs and its distinction, if it has any, is purely decorative."

    I understand from this that the presence absence of a visible keystone is less influenced by the shape of the arch than by the architect's sense of aesthetics.

  20. #20
    Commercial Operator
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Sussex by the Sea
    Posts
    9,276
    Rep Power
    15

    Re: How not to build a tunnel...

    Ahh, civil engineering, I wondered where ESG got the idea he was a smug know-it-all?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Dartford tunnel area on a Monday
    By Andy McGregor in forum Let's talk about dance
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 25th-September-2003, 04:04 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •