Originally Posted by DavidJames
We've discussed yoyos a fair bit, such as this aptly named thread on the yo-yo, but I don't think we've talked about the difference between the yo-yo and the yo-yo push spin.Originally Posted by El Salsero Gringo
The tricky part isn't leading the yo-yo vs the yo-yo push spin - it's doing it clearly enough that my partner doesn't end up waving her right hand uselessly above her head.
Originally Posted by DavidJames
So THAT's your secret?!?!?!?!??!?!?Originally Posted by Gadget
Dammit, when I dance, I can NEVER get loose women...
Steps that is. (I'm sure Drathzel's a wee gem !!)Originally Posted by davidjames
But I don't think I agree with that as a hard and fast rule. It may be that to onlookers and some partners I step out rather a lot, but I believe that's just a part of my overall style; particularly with slower numbers where this can give some dynamism and tension to the dance. (It's either that or venturing into the bluesy UCP area for which I'm not ready and willing.) With some partners this can give a nice fluid dance (provided I don't fluff something in trying to go beyond my basic moves) but there are some partners who give me real trouble. They just don't seem to want to move, or be capable of opening out, and instead bounce about to the beat (and half beat) - I suppose I frustrate them just as much as they frustrate me. Over time I guess we'll come to recognise that we're mutually incompatible and avoid each other except, unavoidably, in the line up. That's life.
It's nothing to do with physique, I'm fairly average, but have enjoyed dances with ladies of all sizes and shapes. One wee gem (another) is very vertically challenged, but she moves, and matches, my steps and leads ..... very responsively, gracefully, and stylishly too. This is the sort of partner who challenges me to interact and respond.
Well, actually, neither do I, for experienced dancers - I know my feet have a life of their own, even I don't know where they're going nextOriginally Posted by Whitebeard
To clarify, I believe "small steps are good when learning". Once you're comfortable with the moves, of course, anything goes.
I think that the problem with "big steps" is that it 'forces' the dancers to bend at the waist and stretch to do some moves: not looking good, harder to lead and "mistakes" are more obvious.
By saying "take small steps", you are just maintaining a decent distance where all the moves can be done keeping relativly upright with good posture.
So it's not so much the size of the steps, but the controll (& awareness) of distance.
OK, I'll say it: "It's not the size, it's what you do with it that counts"Originally Posted by Gadget
(come on, you know you were thinking it )
<serious>Yes, but that's a bit too complex a concept for someone starting out - "keep it small" is a nice easy-to-remember slogan. And the tread title is " Beginner Moves: Tips & advice"</serious>
Another tip along that line: look at your partner (the face). It's not helpful to anyone if you're looking at your or your partner's feet, or indeed any other body part
Pah. How else can you admire their shoes?Originally Posted by DavidJames
It is. The aim was to offer an explination as to why the advice should be followed and what it will do -Originally Posted by DavidJames
I don't want to know, "keep it small","bend your knees","look into her face","smile","don't force her"... I want to know why I should keep it small, how bending the knees will help, why I should stare into her eyes, why my facial expression matters,...
{I would make a rubbish soldier: I do not follow orders or commands very well }
Oh, officer material, I'd sayOriginally Posted by Gadget
But even officers have to go through basic training - and you only get to know why, typically, at a later date. In ceroc terms, if you want to know the "why do it this way?", you need to spend more money on a workshop
It's certainly not ideal, but it's a business - the more you pay, the better-quality instructions you get. Or you can use this forum of course
Thanks for the continuing advice...
I never realised there was so much to the "step back". I was just stepping back!Originally Posted by ducasi
But sorry, it wasn't the initial step back I was referring to (and sorry that it got lost in my abbreviated quoting.) I was meaning when you're in the basket, you and your partner step back together, we're supposed to have mirror-image legs, so I've stepped back on my left, and my partner has stepped back on her right. I guess it looks better than the alternatives.
Any offers?Thanks guys! I guess what I really need is practice. Just have to find someone who's willing to work with me... Hmmm...
when i dance as a man i step back the same way as i do when i am dancing a female....ie on right i think its part habit and part comfort! i feel that i have a better lead when i step back the same way as my follow!Originally Posted by ducasi
And in the similar situation in the First Move. A subject I brought up on the forum some time ago when I noted that all the teachers I've seen demonstrating (as opposed to stepping through) in fact take two steps back; first right, then left.Originally Posted by ducasi
I always felt some awkwardness stepping back with the left only and the reason, I believe, is that my hips want to turn anti-clockwise following the leg, but, at the same time, my left arm is moving right to twist the lady clockwise and my upper body also wants to go in that direction. Conflict !!
So I've tried to retrain myself to take two steps back in the way the teachers do (when they're not teaching). When I get it right the move flows much more smoothly. On the first step back, with the right foot, my whole body is twisting to the right in unison with the lady and there is no conflict. Trying to analyse it I think the second step back with the left is not a full step in that, although my forefoot touches down, there is no actual transfer of weight. It's more of a flick backwards with no corresponding rotation of the hips before stepping forward with that left foot in preparation to untwist the lady and go for the clockwise turn.
Having said that, in some situations I find myself not stepping at all and sort of swaying into the twisting movement with flexing knees following the rythm. And that seems to work quite well ..... all credit to the ladies.
I just hope my clock's going round the right way !!
Last edited by Whitebeard; 19th-March-2005 at 11:58 PM.
I can identify with that ;-)Originally Posted by DavidJames
At appropriate moments, yes. But I can think of one guy whose constant gaze, if I were his partner, I would find very intimidating.Originally Posted by DavidJames
In reality, I think most of us constantly scan around to look for free space, avoid collisions, wink at friends, eye up the talent ?, go blank as we wallow in the music or wonder what on earth to do next, etc., etc.
When I started dancing, I had a very poor level of "body awareness", which I suspect is quite common amongst beginner dancers. As such, looking at my feet helped me avoid tangling them up. I still look at my feet whenever I'm learning or practicing something new.Originally Posted by DavidJames
I still regularly look at my partner's feet/legs (in open position), for a couple of reasons. Firstly, she's often doing extremely cool things with them, and I don't want to miss out. Secondly, I'm not a good enough leader to judge where her body weight is solely through the hand connection.
As an experiment, you might want to try out what DavidB does - in a thread on the first move, he said that he normally steps back right. That means there's no conflict between upper and lower body at all.Originally Posted by Whitebeard
With the greatest of respect to Whitebeard I wouldn't recommend to anyone (and certainly not in a thread entitled "Beginner Moves: tips & advice") to take two steps back in a first move, or to step back with anything other than the outside foot. At least, not until they had the regular First Move sussed and were comfortable with the 'conflict' of hips going one way, shoulders another. I've never seen a Ceroc teacher dance it other than stepping back on the left foot.Originally Posted by Whitebeard
DavidB might prefer to step back on his right, but I bet you a pound to a penny that he could at a pinch step back, forward, left, right, up or down or any combination thereof.
Just a humble opinion from me, of course - there's no need to take the blindest bit of notice.
I have heard it taught from stage to step back with either foot. My preference is to mimic rather than match the lady bacause it is easier and 'flows' better. The only reason that I would [u]not[/i] recommend it for a beginner is that it is a bit more 'intimate' and if mucked up could lead to more embarasment than simply screwing up a move. (well, that and you should always do what the teacher is leading from the stage - even if you would not do it in freestyle: it gives your partner more confidence that you do actually listen.)Originally Posted by El Salsero Gringo
The 'two steps back' actually works better (and is probably what you see as 'two steps') as a step back, then a transfer of weight, causing your hips to line through with the lady's. Allows a much smoother, controlled move with the transfer of weight matching the lady's movement. It also means you are not twisting as much to get that outer hand over so far.
I'm reasonably sure the 'official' Ceroc First Move is definitely for the men to step back on the left - which is how it is taught at Ceroc lessons. For the sway and or basket, one is taught to step back on either foot as far as I remember (for the men.)Originally Posted by Gadget
I have also been taught similar Salsa moves where the guy steps forward on the left foot as the lady steps back (try it) and a Rumba move where the guy steps to the left with the left foot as the lady rotates. The left (outside) foot also has the freedom to swing out, big-toe tracing the floor as it goes for some extra styling if you like that kind of thing, whereas the right is trapped in between you.
Still, the fun part about MJ is you can dance any move - any time you like - in any fashion, and there's no one there with a ruler to slap your wrist for not follwing 'the book'. So whatever works best for you....
Me too !!Originally Posted by Whitebeard
I couldn't work out why I did that - and I think you have captured it WB.
The advantage of Ceroc for me is I don't think about my feet, except to hope they are in a position that will prevent me falling over - which may explain my dance "style"
Don't completely agree - there is an issue about body position and hand connection ... but if you generally mean there is no "prescribed pattern" - I'm with you on thatOriginally Posted by El Salsero Gringo
Exactly! I'll go further. Concentrating on what the student is doing wrong seems to pervade a lot of teaching, not just dance, and such an attitude saps the confidence of any student. Praise what is good, or even acceptable, encourage the student to become self-aware, mildly self-critical and instill a desire to improve. God, I have had some crap teachers (and some inspired ones to compensate).Originally Posted by El Salsero Gringo
CRL
Last edited by Clive Long; 21st-March-2005 at 12:58 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks