Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 25

Thread: Abolish Road Fund Licence

  1. #1
    Registered User bobgadjet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    north bushey
    Posts
    1,189
    Rep Power
    11

    Abolish Road Fund Licence

    Wouldn't it be nice if Road Fund Licence was replaced by a SMALL rise in Petrol/Fuel tax?

    For an average motorist, say 12,000 miles a year with an average family car, say 1500-1800 engine size, there would have to be no more than about 10-15 pence PER GALLON price increase, to collect the same revenue per year.

    The for's for this.......
    Not having to worry about renewing each year.
    NOBODY can evade paying the tax.
    The bigger the engine size, the more fuel used, the more paid.
    The more miles you do, the more you use the roads, the more you pay.
    The less economical your car, the more you pay.
    ANY visitors to this country ALSO pay towards the tax.
    If you tow ANYTHING, it increases your consumption (of fuel) so the more you pay.
    No problem with fraudulence on tax discs.
    Less for the police/traffic wardens to have to catch you for, or look out for.


    The againsts for this.....................can't think of any.

    Instead, we could have the need to display an INSURANCE COVER disc I suppose. This would help in the case of an accident, to take the other party's insurance details.

    Am I being too nieve, or is this just too simple an idea to get implemented?

    How do you feel about it, and is there anything we can do?

  2. #2
    Registered User ChrisA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    3,830
    Rep Power
    11

    Re: Abolish Road Fund Licence

    Originally posted by bobgadjet
    How do you feel about it, and is there anything we can do?
    I think it's a great idea, and have for a long time. Given that I only drive about 3000 miles a year these days (pretty much only to dance venues!), since I work at home, it would be great.

    Problems I can think of, off the top of my head, are that it would encourage switching to diesel, and if they wanted to tax that too, it would clobber the haulage industry.

    It would also get the rural lobby moaning about the fact that they have to do all this driving, so it would be unfair on them

    Chris

  3. #3
    The Forum Legend
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    10,672
    Rep Power
    14
    Another benefit would be that you would no longer need to employ all the people at the DVLA centre in Swansea. Or all the other admin costs involved in taking the payment.

    Of course, it won't happen. But it's a nice idea....

    Steve

  4. #4
    Commercial Operator
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    3,756
    Rep Power
    11
    Originally posted by TheTramp
    Another benefit would be that you would no longer need to employ all the people at the DVLA centre in Swansea. Or all the other admin costs involved in taking the payment.

    Of course, it won't happen. But it's a nice idea....

    Steve
    Ah but you would steve. You still need them for vehicle registration documents , and driving licences. and (shop steward mode on )...you wouldn't want to cause mass unemployment in Swansea would you...you being a Welsh lad an' all ( shop steward mode off)............

    I do think the road fund licence is a bit of a swizz though. In the USA there are no road fund licences, and petrol is less than half the price it is over here....

  5. #5
    Registered User bobgadjet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    north bushey
    Posts
    1,189
    Rep Power
    11

    Re: Re: Abolish Road Fund Licence

    Originally posted by ChrisA

    Problems I can think of, off the top of my head, are that it would encourage switching to diesel, and if they wanted to tax that too, it would clobber the haulage industry.

    Chris
    I did clarify "fuel", which could include ALL fuel, including LPG.
    If you think it would REALLY hurt the haulage indistry, try asking them how much it would SAVE them on thier road fund licence?
    Diesel users do more miles per gallon (usually) anyway, so, less tax.

    I don't know what it costs to licence one of those huge juganaughts, but I bet it's more than I could afford, and if it's off the road....... well, need I say more.

    Just like if you took a holiday, you don't use your car, but you cannot claim that 2-3 weeks road fund licence back.

    If your car was sick, and had to take maybe a month or two off, then you can't claim that tax back.

    Have you tyried to claim back the road fund licence after having your car stolen? Happened to a friend of mine who had renewed the tax on his car a month before he had it stolen. When he went to claim the tax back he was asked to produce the disc he was claiming back from. WHAT ! (goes to show something we all suspected I suppose).

    Frankly there is so little "against" it from the "common sense" point of view, I'm surprised that the motoring organisations haven't pushed for it, or have they, but I missed it?

  6. #6
    Registered User bobgadjet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    north bushey
    Posts
    1,189
    Rep Power
    11
    Originally posted by Dance Demon

    In the USA there are no road fund licences, and petrol is less than half the price it is over here....
    EXACTLY

    But I think the difference in their fuel costs and ours is another thread entirely, so, off you go........

  7. #7
    The Forum Legend
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    10,672
    Rep Power
    14
    Originally posted by Dance Demon
    Ah but you would steve. You still need them for vehicle registration documents , and driving licences. and (shop steward mode on )...you wouldn't want to cause mass unemployment in Swansea would you...you being a Welsh lad an' all ( shop steward mode off)............
    Well. You'd still need the departments that dealt with those things. But you could get rid of a whole group of people that deals with Road Tax.

    Mass unemployment in Swansea is fine. They're just a bunch of Jacks down there anyhow.

    (Local Cardiff/Swansea rivalry is still there apparently).

    Steve

  8. #8
    Registered User bobgadjet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    north bushey
    Posts
    1,189
    Rep Power
    11
    Originally posted by TheTramp
    Another benefit would be that you would no longer need to employ all the people at the DVLA centre in Swansea. Or all the other admin costs involved in taking the payment.

    Of course, it won't happen. But it's a nice idea....

    Steve
    Surely you would need them to run the
    "Department of
    What A Shrewd Tax Everybody Demands
    To Increase Motoring Expense"
    (check the initials)

  9. #9
    Teacher Paul F's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Caterham, Surrey
    Posts
    2,408
    Rep Power
    11
    I like the idea of making people who drive poweful engine cars (say >1.8) pay more. This would do that but with the new crop of ECO cars and the fact that diesel cars are generally high powered cars I dont think its fair to charge EVERYBODY the same in one foul swoop - because of emissions.


    Emissions are one of the main concerns re. driving costs and the current system that charges you related to how much pollutant your car emits I think is good.
    This way, Joe Bloggs who drives a Jag X-Type will have to pay considerably more than me driving a diesel-eco which emits minimal pollutants.

    If we abolish this then Mr.Bloggs can pollute all the air he wants while I have to pay the same higher cost of driving even though I have been considerate in choosing a car.

  10. #10
    Registered User bobgadjet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    north bushey
    Posts
    1,189
    Rep Power
    11
    Originally posted by Paul F

    Emissions are one of the main concerns re. driving costs and the current system that charges you related to how much pollutant your car emits I think is good.
    This way, Joe Bloggs who drives a Jag X-Type will have to pay considerably more than me driving a diesel-eco which emits minimal pollutants.

    If we abolish this then Mr.Bloggs can pollute all the air he wants while I have to pay the same higher cost of driving even though I have been considerate in choosing a car.
    Well, just think again......... The less pollutant fuels are already carrying a lower tax, and dielsel cars "usually" do more miles per gallon.
    In each case you mentioned above YOU WOULD eventually pay less tax than your friend Mr Bloggs in his fuel guzzling Jax X-type.
    How many gallons to the mile does HE do compared to YOU.

    BTW have you seen the pollution a badly maintained diesel vehicle pumps out? Try following one in the many traffic jams around our overcrowded road country.

    What diesel car have you got then?

  11. #11
    Registered User bobgadjet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    north bushey
    Posts
    1,189
    Rep Power
    11
    Originally posted by Paul F
    I dont think its fair to charge EVERYBODY the same in one foul swoop - because of emissions.
    Just read your quote again........

    how are you charging EVERYBODY the same?

    The more you use, the more you pay.

    If you do, say, 30,000 miles a year in your 1200 diesel fiesta, how would you be paying the same tax, per year, as your neigbour doing, say, 30,000 miles in his/hers Navy Blue, White wall tyred, Leather upholstered 7.5 litre Twin Turbo Bentley (lovely motor), no matter how ECO the engine was made to be?

  12. #12
    Teacher Paul F's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Caterham, Surrey
    Posts
    2,408
    Rep Power
    11
    Originally posted by bobgadjet
    Well, just think again......... The less pollutant fuels are already carrying a lower tax, and dielsel cars "usually" do more miles per gallon.
    In each case you mentioned above YOU WOULD eventually pay less tax than your friend Mr Bloggs in his fuel guzzling Jax X-type.
    How many gallons to the mile does HE do compared to YOU.

    BTW have you seen the pollution a badly maintained diesel vehicle pumps out? Try following one in the many traffic jams around our overcrowded road country.

    What diesel car have you got then?
    Yeah, i see what you mean but im not really thinking of old cars as hopefully they will die out.
    The new common-rail injected diesel engines are some of the cleanest you can buy.

    Essentially the World Health Organisation are concerned with CO2, Carbon Monoxide and HydroCarbons primarily in the emissions studies.

    Hypothetical situation (as i dont have a new car yet) -

    I filled up my car(diesel/low power car) and Mr Bloggs filled his Jag.

    We both drove until our tanks were empty.

    Irrespective of how far we have gone (thats of personal benefit not environmental) I will have produced less CO2 (although only slightly), considerably less Carbon Monoxide and less Hydrocarbons (proven link to cancer).

    To go the same distance Mr Bloggs would have hade to refill and burn considerably more fuel producing much higher levels of CO2.

    Scheme in place - I get my fuel for a not-too-bad price. He pays quite a lot for fuel. I get less tax per year - he gets lots.

    Replacement - We both pay the same tax (0) yet my fuel bill escalates (so does his but why should i suffer)

  13. #13
    Commercial Operator
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    3,756
    Rep Power
    11
    Originally posted by bobgadjet
    EXACTLY

    But I think the difference in their fuel costs and ours is another thread entirely, so, off you go........
    Hah!!! you don't get rid of me that easily ......you did mention in your original posting that RFL wshould be replaced by an increase in fuel prices. My point was that in the USA they have no RFL, but they don,t have higher fuel charges to compensate either.

  14. #14
    Registered User bobgadjet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    north bushey
    Posts
    1,189
    Rep Power
    11
    Originally posted by Paul F
    To go the same distance Mr Bloggs would have had to refill and burn considerably more fuel producing much higher levels of CO2.

    Scheme in place - I get my fuel for a not-too-bad price. He pays quite a lot for fuel. I get less tax per year - he gets lots.

    My argument exactly, you say "I get less tax per year - he gets lots" and "To go the same distance Mr Bloggs would have had to refill"

    But you seem to argue against yourself ! I respect that he would cause more pollution, but he would pay more for the priviledge anyway, so would provide (if it were used more wisely) more revenue to be spent towards replenishing requirements to replenish the atmospheric losses.

  15. #15
    Registered User bobgadjet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    north bushey
    Posts
    1,189
    Rep Power
    11
    Originally posted by Dance Demon
    Hah!!! you don't get rid of me that easily ......you did mention in your original posting that RFL should be replaced by an increase in fuel prices. My point was that in the USA they have no RFL, but they don,t have higher fuel charges to compensate either.
    Granted, but they have the ability to raise huge funds in other directions.

    How much do they pay for their plate tax ?

  16. #16
    Teacher Paul F's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Caterham, Surrey
    Posts
    2,408
    Rep Power
    11
    Originally posted by bobgadjet
    My argument exactly, you say "I get less tax per year - he gets lots" and "To go the same distance Mr Bloggs would have had to refill"

    But you seem to argue against yourself ! I respect that he would cause more pollution, but he would pay more for the priviledge anyway, so would provide (if it were used more wisely) more revenue to be spent towards replenishing requirements to replenish the atmospheric losses.
    I dont understand your argument.

    In the proposition of abolishing tax he doesnt get punished for driving a huge engine car

    Yes, he has to fill up more but he does that now anyway.

  17. #17
    Registered User bobgadjet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    north bushey
    Posts
    1,189
    Rep Power
    11
    Originally posted by Paul F
    I dont understand your argument.

    In the proposition of abolishing tax he doesnt get punished for driving a huge engine car

    Yes, he has to fill up more but he does that now anyway.
    Of course he does, he has to spend more on fuel, therefore more tax.
    I accept the high pollution would remaing the same, but that's not the thread matter, so if you want a thread on the pollution aspect, then............ off you go..............

  18. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Gold Coast, Austra
    Posts
    2,345
    Rep Power
    11
    Road Tax is also a good way of checking people have insurance for thier car (if my memory of the system serves me well) as you have to show proof of up to date insurance to get your disc.

    As a Govermnment why distroy a profitable income, if they thought they could increase fuel tax they would (and often do make increases in most budgets).This way they can tax you twice - well three times actually as there is also VAT - well maybe 4 times as you have paid tax on PAYE already

  19. #19
    Registered User bobgadjet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    north bushey
    Posts
    1,189
    Rep Power
    11
    Originally posted by Martin
    Road Tax is also a good way of checking people have insurance for thier car (if my memory of the system serves me well) as you have to show proof of up to date insurance to get your disc.

    As a Govermnment why distroy a profitable income, if they thought they could increase fuel tax they would (and often do make increases in most budgets).This way they can tax you twice - well three times actually as there is also VAT - well maybe 4 times as you have paid tax on PAYE already
    HHmmmm. Get your point there.....
    Oh yes, 5 times.......... but at least you have a choice... M6 Toll ?

  20. #20
    Registered User DangerousCurves's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    344
    Rep Power
    11

    Re: Abolish Road Fund Licence

    Originally posted by bobgadjet


    Instead, we could have the need to display an INSURANCE COVER disc I suppose. This would help in the case of an accident, to take the other party's insurance details.

    This is a nice thought - and reminded me of one of my pet ideas...

    This may not be universally popular, but I think that cyclists using the road should have to be insured too.

    I live in a bohemian sort of town, and frequently see cyclists without lights, or cycling across junctions when lights are against them, or mounting pavements, or going the wrong way up one-way streets. I used to tolerate this with just a shake of the head (and an avoiding swerve of the motor), but a short while ago a friend of mine was seriously injured in an accident caused by a cyclist who probably doesn't have the means to compensate him for the absolute devastation he has brought into his life.

    Anyone can get an old bike, in any condition and hit the roads without any tests as to its roadworthiness, their ability to cycle or their knowledge of the road traffic code. Cyclists also make no direct financial contribution to the upkeep of the roads which they use.

    I do appreciate that many who cycle don't have a lot of cash to spare - but after my friend's experience I would support compulsary insurance.

    What do others think?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The road to Ceroc.
    By Franck in forum Chit Chat
    Replies: 190
    Last Post: 2nd-August-2011, 10:10 PM
  2. CJ Road Trip
    By CJ in forum Social events
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 14th-November-2005, 02:21 PM
  3. on the road again
    By CJ in forum Social events
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 16th-October-2002, 01:25 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •