Since you know what the public want, perhaps you could enlighten us.
Can you please tell us what the public voted for?
And, once again, please explain how you would change FPTP to prevent coaolition Governments in the future, since they are such a terrible and unwanted thing.
How is that less of a wasted vote than voting for any candidate contender that doesn't win under FPTP? I fail to see how the two situations are different.
This I don't understand. The voter is required to rank all of the candidates. Are you saying they would know less about the candidates than under FPTP or run off or any other election system. If so, why do they suddenly know less? Or are you suggesting that the average voter doesn't understand what a rank means?
If you're suggesting that your vote might go to a candidate that you didn't want, then either it's your fault for ranking them ahead of someone you did want or it's electoral fraud. Which of these do you think it is?
Bookmarks