Gosh. Is it the tennis season already?
I was just thinking how civilised the forum had become, being able to discuss religion without attempting to rip each others throats out.
But don't let me spoil the fun, Do carry on, please.
I'm with Ghost in the sense that we can only have the concept of God that our pathetically limited human brains trapped in our animal bodies are capable of. We cannot know what else may be out there.
I don't read it like this. I think it means God looks like a human because he made humans to look like him. Ergo.....Originally Posted by DS
However, it is exactly the sort of thing a pathetically limited human brain would invent, so I'm discounting it, really. Are we to think that God has a hairy chest, myopia and flat feet? I think not. At best it means something symbolic and poetic but d*mned if I know what. Nor does anyone else.
I must take you up on an important point here. Your use of quote marks underlines your suggestion that God is a mere human concept and not real.
However, your use of quote marks in the second sentence implies that the same scepticism should be applied to Ghost. Not ghosts, although that would surely make a worthy thread, why hasn't it been done?
I'm not attempting to prove or disprove the existence of God, but the existence of Ghost should be fairly simple, I think I might even have danced with him.
Bookmarks