Not as worrying as the implications of this http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_royals...princess-diana
Not as worrying as the implications of this http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_royals...princess-diana
I must admit to being a bit of an anti Diana person myself.
At the risk of going off tangent and without delving for the moment too deeply into conspiracy theories, one thing is clear. There is no way on this earth that the British Royal Family would allow the mother of the king of England to marry (conceive children with) a muslim/arab. Plus every country in "western Europe" would do what they could to assist and prevent such a union.
Because any issue might have a claim or try to claim the British Throne.
Just my conspiracy theory. It will of course never be proved either way. But I wouldn't be surprised. If there was foul play it would suit France and Europe to keep it quiet.
How ? and, are you aware of the history of the british throne?
They kept it quiet because it never happened - theres a possibility.Just my conspiracy theory. It will of course never be proved either way. But I wouldn't be surprised. If there was foul play it would suit France and Europe to keep it quiet.
I am very aware. A favourite subject. Of course there have been usurpers (Stephen), and even distant cousins (William IV springs to mind), but not so far, a Muslim as far as I'm aware. And that as I suggested is something they would try to avoid at any cost.
Yes I know. I am happy to accept the official version. Just saying that's all.
Then again, I would love to believe that the lunar landings never occurred. Doesn't a part of you?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks