Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 114

Thread: Leadable and unleadable moves (split from New Year, New Dance)

  1. #61
    Commercial Operator
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Sussex by the Sea
    Posts
    9,276
    Rep Power
    15

    Re: Leadable and unleadable moves (split from New Year, New Dance)

    Quote Originally Posted by Moo View Post
    Any consensus on the best way to lead it ?
    My own opinion is that the Columbian is led using frame and body leads. This requires a bit of hand action with the guys left hand changing the attitude of the lady's frame so she's stepping backwards in the 'behind' bit of the move and then using the left hand again to change the attitude of the frame so she's stepping forward in the 'forward' bit of the move.

    My short calls for this move after 'starts like a first move but this is where it changes' are 'forward - behind - forward - forward - forward - behind - forward - forward - forward - behind''.

    My preference for the right hand is on the top of the lady's hip (iliac crest) or waist rather than the shoulder blade - this isn't because it's a better lead position, it's because the man's hand on the lady's shoulder blade means the the lady's left breast could press against the guys wrist as she turns to step backwards on the 'behind' bit - some ladies might like this with the right man, but most women object - in my experience

  2. #62
    Registered User Ghost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Astral
    Posts
    3,209
    Rep Power
    10

    Re: Leadable and unleadable moves (split from New Year, New Dance)

    Quote Originally Posted by Moo View Post
    Any consensus on the best way to lead it ?
    1. Lead it on followers who know it
    2. If leading it followers who don't know it, don't let them think! Because the odds of them working out what to do are pretty slim. (Eventually if you mirror the correct footwork and persist they'll get it but I don't really like this approach and you need a lot of room)

    I once had a conversation while dancing about how the woman I was dancing with just couldn't follow Columbians and how they were unleadable. I agreed. After about 10-20 seconds of discussing this I pointed out I'd just led her in a Columbian forwards, backwards, and going round in a circle cw and acw.

    But as soon as I see the cogs going round in a follower's head I'm doomed and she'll invariably do some other variation of walk

    Personally I prefer a shoulder blade tango embrace, but then I learnt the technique for the move in tango....

  3. #63
    Formerly known as DavidJames David Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Norf Lundin
    Posts
    17,001
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    18

    Re: Leadable and unleadable moves (split from New Year, New Dance)

    Quote Originally Posted by Moo View Post
    I also noticed that the lead (the part where you lead the follower into the first step behind) was done on the followers hip (rather than shoulder blade). I seem to get different feedback depending on where I attend, as to whether partners find it awkard led at the hip as opposed to the shoulder blade.

    I did have one lesson with Simon and Nicole, where they did this with the right arm lead on the shoulder blade (tucked through the armpit iyswim). Any thoughts on whether this is best led shoulder or hip, as I seem to change.
    Not relevant. If you're thinking about using your hand to lead the move, it's already going wrong. At most, you should only be giving a slight nudge with your hand.

    Quote Originally Posted by Moo View Post
    II also noticed on the moves site mentioned earlier, that they say this move is an unleadable move .
    They're wrong

    (yes, I know, I'm the one who gave the Jiveoholics link... )

    Quote Originally Posted by Moo View Post
    Any consensus on the best way to lead it ?
    Well, that's interesting.... Because the variation I do (and I suspect Ghost does also) has different footwork - instead of both partners stepping forwards (and sideways) simultaneously, I step forwards as the woman steps back, and vice versa. This, to me, is nicer, more elegant and easier to lead; I use dissociation and body leads to do it. We'd call it a linear giro in Tango, partially coz we like using foreign names for things. Foreign names are cool.

    However, the Official Columbian may need more frame to lead.

    (In tango, the Official Version is more of an Americana movement - for an example.)

    Either way, you need some technique to lead and follow the movement.

  4. #64
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sussex
    Posts
    10
    Rep Power
    8

    Re: Leadable and unleadable moves (split from New Year, New Dance)

    Quote Originally Posted by David Bailey View Post
    Not relevant. If you're thinking about using your hand to lead the move, it's already going wrong. At most, you should only be giving a slight nudge with your hand.
    Just to clarify, I didn't mean lead solely with the hand, thats just a connection point of the frame with a hint of steer (in some cases). It was more focusing on where the connection point was.

    In my mind, I was trying to figure out, if the frame is somehow more stable, if the main connection points are higher or lower (than the dissociation point if that makes sense). I think I'd need to have a partner with me to have a bash at explaining it properly.


    The variation you mention, I think thats the way I learnt with Simon and Nicole. I've been trying that, and find its preferable for me, but I think sometimes I find myself lagging just a moment behind the follower on the first backstep which I'm trying to fix. This doesn't happen for me if I do it the traditional way, as I feel more synchronized rather than having a waiting moment (whilst she steps back. If we're talking about a different variation that may not make sense! Ah, maybe ignore that, are you talking about doing a different step just for the first follower step back before the actual start of the columbian, or every time, so its some type of converse Columbian whatever that means ?)
    Last edited by Moo; 7th-January-2011 at 04:36 PM.

  5. #65
    Formerly known as DavidJames David Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Norf Lundin
    Posts
    17,001
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    18

    Re: Leadable and unleadable moves (split from New Year, New Dance)

    Quote Originally Posted by Moo View Post
    Just to clarify, I didn't mean lead solely with the hand, thats just a connection point of the frame with a hint of steer (in some cases). It was more focusing on where the connection point was.

    In my mind, I was trying to figure out, if the frame is somehow more stable, if the main connection points are higher or lower (than the dissociation point if that makes sense). I think I'd need to have a partner with me to have a bash at explaining it properly.
    In that case, fair enough - I'd also go for the shoulder blade as the hold.


    Quote Originally Posted by Moo View Post
    The variation you mention, I think thats the way I learnt with Simon and Nicole. I've been trying that, and find its preferable for me, but I think sometimes I find myself lagging just a moment behind the follower on the first backstep which I'm trying to fix. This doesn't happen for me if I do it the traditional way, as I feel more synchronized rather than having a waiting moment (whilst she steps back. If we're talking about a different variation that may not make sense! Ah, maybe ignore that, are you talking about doing a different step just for the first follower step back before the actual start of the columbian, or every time, so its some type of converse Columbian whatever that means ?)
    Err... dunno. I can't find a video of a linear giro, which is annoying...

    Basically, the variation I like has:
    Leader: Side -> forward -> side -> back -> side etc.
    Follower: Side -> back - > side -> forward -> side etc.

    Whereas the tradition Columbian is:
    Leader: Side -> forward -> side -> back -> side etc.
    Follower: Side -> forward -> side -> back -> side etc.

  6. #66
    Registered User Ghost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Astral
    Posts
    3,209
    Rep Power
    10

    Re: Leadable and unleadable moves (split from New Year, New Dance)

    Quote Originally Posted by Moo View Post
    I also noticed on the moves site mentioned earlier, that they say this move is an unleadable move .
    Quote Originally Posted by David Bailey View Post
    They're wrong
    In fairness it's worth noting that the people saying it's leadable are teachers with double digits years of doing Ceroc and some have with quite a bit of jango and tango experience too.

    It reminds me of something Franck said a long time ago.

    Quote Originally Posted by Me
    I'm so glad there's no footwork in Ceroc
    Quote Originally Posted by Franck
    A common misquote! the correct version of the above is: "There is no set footwork in Ceroc"
    So yes a linear giro / columbian is leadable. However I'd argue that's it's not repeatably leadable by an average good intermediate leader unless the follower specifically knows it.

    Categorically I can't lead a columbian 100% of the time on a Ceroc follower who doesn't know it. Make of that what you will.

    Quote Originally Posted by David Bailey View Post
    Well, that's interesting.... Because the variation I do (and I suspect Ghost does also) has different footwork - instead of both partners stepping forwards (and sideways) simultaneously, I step forwards as the woman steps back, and vice versa. This, to me, is nicer, more elegant and easier to lead;
    Definitely agree with David's points. I often just walk alongside though. I don't do it, but if you want to do the show by example version, then you need to mirror her.

    Quote Originally Posted by David Bailey View Post
    Either way, you need some technique to lead and follow the movement.
    The problem I've found is that the technique I use is from tango. it works perfectly on tango followers, but not so well on Cerocers because they don't know the same things.

    A food for thought quote from Andreas Wichter

    "You're not leading me - you're making me understand what it is you want me to do; it's not the same thing."

  7. #67
    Formerly known as DavidJames David Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Norf Lundin
    Posts
    17,001
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    18

    Re: Leadable and unleadable moves (split from New Year, New Dance)

    Quote Originally Posted by Ghost View Post
    Definitely agree with David's points. I often just walk alongside though. I don't do it, but if you want to do the show by example version, then you need to mirror her.
    If you want to be really flash, you do it whilst walking backwards

  8. #68
    Registered User Ghost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Astral
    Posts
    3,209
    Rep Power
    10

    Re: Leadable and unleadable moves (split from New Year, New Dance)

    Quote Originally Posted by David Bailey View Post
    If you want to be really flash, you do it whilst walking backwards
    Hee.

    And if you've been thinking far too much about musicality lately, you could do syncopated sidesteps

  9. #69
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Oxford
    Posts
    677
    Rep Power
    9

    Re: Leadable and unleadable moves (split from New Year, New Dance)

    Quote Originally Posted by Ghost View Post
    1. Lead it on followers who know it
    I really disagree with that. It's not about whether they know the columbian or not: it's about whether they give you a frame to work with. I find people who think they know it worse, because they try and do the move instead of following the lead. But you seem to know this...
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy McGregor View Post
    My own opinion is that the Columbian is led using frame and body leads.
    Quote Originally Posted by David Bailey View Post
    Not relevant. If you're thinking about using your hand to lead the move, it's already going wrong. At most, you should only be giving a slight nudge with your hand.
    Exactly. It's easy to lead this way...
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy McGregor View Post
    Because the variation I do (and I suspect Ghost does also) has different footwork
    Quote Originally Posted by Moo View Post
    The variation you mention, I think thats the way I learnt with Simon and Nicole.
    I've done both variations, and heard them called by a bunch of different names, in both open and closed holds. The technique and movement are the same, only the hold (and the point of connection) change.

  10. #70
    Registered User Ghost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Astral
    Posts
    3,209
    Rep Power
    10

    Re: Leadable and unleadable moves (split from New Year, New Dance)

    Quote Originally Posted by Ghost View Post
    1. Lead it on followers who know it
    Quote Originally Posted by geoff332 View Post
    I really disagree with that. It's not about whether they know the columbian or not: it's about whether they give you a frame to work with. I find people who think they know it worse, because they try and do the move instead of following the lead. But you seem to know this...
    Good point.

    Basically it depends on your point of view and I wasn't entirely sure what Moo was going for. A lot of Ceroc leaders would be perfectly happy that they had led the move if they basically got the woman started and then accompanied her as she did the rest. There's also an argument for doing this for a bit when learning to lead it so you can get used to doing your part without having to deal with leading everything.

    While I agree that the follower's frame is important, there's not much a leader can do if they don't have one, other than to recognise this and not attempt to lead the move. (Or settle for saying "Columbian", I guess)

    For leaders who want to lead the move to a deeper definition of "lead", then simply define the following knowing the move as including knowing about frame, connection etc and how they apply to it.

    Edit - though this runs into the problem that frame , connection etc aren't standardly taught.

    Better answer. If you really want to lead columbians or for that matter ochos, take up tango; it's much easier to lead them there.
    Last edited by Ghost; 7th-January-2011 at 09:12 PM.

  11. #71
    Registered User Ghost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Astral
    Posts
    3,209
    Rep Power
    10

    Re: Leadable and unleadable moves (split from New Year, New Dance)

    Thinking about it there might be a way....


    I like followers who play, sabotage and hijack . As such my lead is very invitational. So for example I do a movement which clearly indicates I want the follower to step forward. It's then up to her to recognise this and then either accept and step forward, or do to something else.

    As such for me the columbian only really works if the follower understands what the lead for each element means so that she can freely accept or not.

    David on the other hand is the opposite.

    So it's possible that a more authoritarian leading style is the best approach to leading a columbian on a follower with basic following skills who doesn't know it.

  12. #72
    Registered User ant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Borehamwood, Herts
    Posts
    632
    Rep Power
    9

    Re: Leadable and unleadable moves (split from New Year, New Dance)

    Quote Originally Posted by Ghost View Post
    I like followers who play, sabotage and hijack . As such my lead is very invitational. So for example I do a movement which clearly indicates I want the follower to step forward. It's then up to her to recognise this and then either accept and step forward, or do to something else.

    As such for me the columbian only really works if the follower understands what the lead for each element means so that she can freely accept or not.
    I find when as a leader you are walking and not mirroring this lead works best in the above situation and you are relying on the follower to pick up what you want by small disociation movement. I think that the move can go wrong with this lead if it is over led.


    David on the other hand is the opposite.
    So it's possible that a more authoritarian leading style is the best approach to leading a columbian on a follower with basic following skills who doesn't know it
    When you just go for it then the mirroring works best as I feel you need an equal amount of dissociation in the body of the leader and follower to lead the move in this way.

  13. #73
    Forum Bombshell - Our Queen! Lory's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    North London
    Posts
    9,918
    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    17

    Re: Leadable and unleadable moves (split from New Year, New Dance)

    Quote Originally Posted by Ghost View Post
    1. Lead it on followers who know it
    I know this was said 'tongue in cheek' but you'd be amazed at how many people ask "did you do the lesson?" before attempting a move, as if I wouldn't be able to follow it, if I hadn't learnt it

    I just reply, you lead it and I'll have a go anyway
    MODERATOR AT YOUR SERVICE
    "If you're going to do something tonight, that you know you'll be sorry for in the morning, plan a lie in." Lorraine

  14. #74
    Commercial Operator
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    London
    Posts
    410
    Rep Power
    11

    Re: Leadable and unleadable moves (split from New Year, New Dance)

    Originally Posted by Franck
    A common misquote! the correct version of the above is: "There is no set footwork in Ceroc"
    Or even better 'There is no agreement about footwork in Ceroc'

    or even better 'There is no agreement'

  15. #75
    Commercial Operator
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Sussex by the Sea
    Posts
    9,276
    Rep Power
    15

    Re: Leadable and unleadable moves (split from New Year, New Dance)

    Quote Originally Posted by Amir View Post
    Or even better 'There is no agreement about footwork in Ceroc'

    or even better 'There is no agreement'
    As Ceroc is not a dance but a trademarked company name there can be no footwork in Ceroc.

    It's a bit like saying there's no beef in McDonalds - but there is in their burgers - unless it's chicken or fish

    The difference is that Ceroc doesn't seem to agree what it puts in it's burgers. If you were to listen to Franck you'd get the impression that you could ask for a cheeseburger and on one day it could be fish, but on another day it could be beef - but Franck would say it doesn't matter as it's all protein and very tasty

  16. #76
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Oxford
    Posts
    677
    Rep Power
    9

    Re: Leadable and unleadable moves (split from New Year, New Dance)

    Quote Originally Posted by Amir View Post
    or even better 'There is no agreement'
    I disagree.

  17. #77
    Commercial Operator
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Northeastern Parts
    Posts
    5,221
    Rep Power
    14

    Re: Leadable and unleadable moves (split from New Year, New Dance)

    Quote Originally Posted by geoff332 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Amir View Post
    'There is no agreement'
    I disagree.
    I think you're both wrong.

  18. #78
    Registered User David Franklin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,426
    Rep Power
    14

    Re: Leadable and unleadable moves (split from New Year, New Dance)

    Quote Originally Posted by Lory View Post
    I know this was said 'tongue in cheek' but you'd be amazed at how many people ask "did you do the lesson?" before attempting a move, as if I wouldn't be able to follow it, if I hadn't learnt it

    I just reply, you lead it and I'll have a go anyway
    I'm reminded of a Yuval and Natalie story (can't find it online, so this is embellished^h^h^h^h rephrased in my own words).

    Y/N were teaching somewhere, and half way through the lesson a follow comes in, explaining "It'll be all right, I just follow the lead".

    Upon overhearing this, Yuval says "so let me just remind you of the last move", and throws Natalie about 15 feet in the air for a death-dive down the back.

    The follow made her excuses and left.

  19. #79
    Commercial Operator
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Sussex by the Sea
    Posts
    9,276
    Rep Power
    15

    Re: Leadable and unleadable moves (split from New Year, New Dance)

    Quote Originally Posted by David Franklin View Post
    The follow made her excuses and left.
    It makes a funny story but is probably bad for business.

  20. #80
    Forum Bombshell - Our Queen! Lory's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    North London
    Posts
    9,918
    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    17

    Re: Leadable and unleadable moves (split from New Year, New Dance)

    Quote Originally Posted by David Franklin View Post
    The follow made her excuses and left.
    I'd have done the same!
    MODERATOR AT YOUR SERVICE
    "If you're going to do something tonight, that you know you'll be sorry for in the morning, plan a lie in." Lorraine

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. New year, new dance...(apparently)
    By Lost Leader in forum Let's talk about dance
    Replies: 269
    Last Post: 25th-May-2011, 03:55 PM
  2. New Moves
    By Robin in forum Intermediate Corner
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 20th-May-2005, 11:54 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •