1. First Move
2. Arm Jive Push Spin
3. Catapult.
I've got a beginner private student starting next week and have been considering which 3 moves are best to start with for a lead...
and thought I would see what opinion was here....
1. First Move
2. Arm Jive Push Spin
3. Catapult.
--ooOoo--
Age is a question of mind over matter, if you don't mind, it doesn't matter
Leroy (Satchel) Paige (1906-1982)
Mickey Mouse's girlfriend, Minnie, made her film debut, along with Mickey, in "Steamboat Willie" on November 18, 1928.
That date is recognized as her official birthday.
I never teach the push spin to beginners - and I can't remember the last time I taught it to anybody at all! It's because a spin is much more intuitive if it's led somewhere near the lady's centre of gravity - leading a spin with a flat hand at shoulder height is more likely to put the lady off balance or get the lady to travel and complete the turn in 2 beats rather than spin on the spot in one beat.
My advice is to teach the following;
1. Travelling arm jive with a travelling return to finish
2. Manspin collecting right to right
3. Travelling ladyspin with a return on the spot to finish and collect the lady's spare hand to start again.
This is the routine I teach when I have a class where everyone is a beginner. You know the kind of thing, weddings, PTA socials, etc.
This routine has plenty of change place moves and the lady is mostly doing 180 pivot turns on each beat/step rather than 360 degree turns on each beat/step - the final turn is a 360 but that comes at the end of the routine. Another good thing with this routine is that the travelling return from the travelling arm jive is just like the 'girl goes through' bit of the octopus.
What this routine does not have is the guy turning under his own hand. Beginner guys find this difficult and is the reason some guys struggle with 'the guy goes trough' bit the octopus. And the catapult is a very difficult move for beginners with loads of stuff going on - it's almost a routine on it's own!
How does that one go? Sounds awfully complicated - armjive is a nice easy beginner move, but a travelling one would've put me in panic mode..
Normal armjive is much nicer than a pushspin one for me - but that may be personal preference.
My first class taught Armjive Swizzle, Basket and Shoulder Slide, and I still think that's a nasty starter
If you can go beyond 3 moves (and I don't know whether that becomes too much to take in, as I'm not a teacher) throw in the backpass - there's nothing worse as a beginner than finding yourself right-to-right with bugger all options available to you. The link moves (shoulder slide, manspin, backpass) and the momentum moves (step across, travelling return) made a massive difference to getting through a whole song as a beginner.
Yli, my opinion.
I like the plain arm jive, it is good for a newbie guy and easy to get to grips with.
I'd add a man spin, to start the guy off understanding he has to move too
Then I'd maybe go for a basket or an octopus
1. syncopated pretzel
2. tumble drier
3. back to the future
1. suger push
2. left side pass
3. whip
![]()
![]()
I haven't taught/taxied since 2001. But in my experience a slight push downwards with the man's flat hand from shoulder height allows the lady to spin just fine. And isn't that what Ceroc teaches/taught?
Though they have changed teaching techniques on a number of moves. I was taught the Wurlitzer where the man stands at a slight angle away from the lady and as he flings her hand for the spin he turns toward her and stamps (yes taught to stamp). I know that is taught quite differently now.
--ooOoo--
Age is a question of mind over matter, if you don't mind, it doesn't matter
Leroy (Satchel) Paige (1906-1982)
Mickey Mouse's girlfriend, Minnie, made her film debut, along with Mickey, in "Steamboat Willie" on November 18, 1928.
That date is recognized as her official birthday.
A private lesson to learn moves is a waste of time! You need to teach him how to dance and move his body correctly! Get him to understand those sound principals first! He can get moves from anywhere! In fact i'd even suggest he goes to some beginners classes first so he get some basic understanding, you then have something to build on! It's not moves we need!
She didn't say that is what the customer asked for??? and i would hope it is not about making money but even if Yils intention is soley to make money then i believe getting repeat business comes from the customer seeing themselves progress, if you teach him moves rather than learning how to dance then he can''t possibly improve as a dancer, he'll probably end up being a pattern machine, and as i said he can get a million patterns from DVD`s or classes but what he can't get from classes is how to dance properly! I've learnt through experience that the people still taking repeat lessons are the ones who want to learn how to become better dancers rather than wanting more moves! People will quickly and ultimately get bored of patterns!
If he learns moves then it is hardly a waste of time.
The Ceroc/leroc principle of learning moves first does allow for a greater understanding of "how to dance" later on - probably most of us learnt that way. And doing it the other way round - learning physicallity, musicallity and allowing the moves to flow naturally from that...would probably have lead to a class drop-out rate of 90% or so.You need to teach him how to dance and move his body correctly! Get him to understand those sound principals first! He can get moves from anywhere!We don't know the full situation for this particular person, but for you to suggest "he can get moves from anywhere" is silly - let me sarcastically state that you tend to only get them from a modern jive class or a person willing to teach you, and he is choosing to get them via a private lesson with Yli.
Yes it is. No it isnt. It depends. Also, I have to take issue with you logic here - you say its not moves we need, then suggest that he goes to some beginners classes which will mostly teach him...think about it!In fact i'd even suggest he goes to some beginners classes first so he get some basic understanding, you then have something to build on! It's not moves we need!
Worst advice ever : 2 out of 10.
I'd avoid teaching the First Move, it teaches very little about technique.
In fact, I'd avoid teaching any of the "complex moves" - pretzel, catapult, etc. (Although see caveat at the end of this post)
I did a private "basics" class a couple of weeks ago (yes, I know, don't tell anyone!), we covered a small set of fundamentals, each covering a fundamental area:
- Arm Jive: transfer of weight and "keep moving" default move
- In and out / side-to-side: accordion motion
- Turn / return: turning (leading and following)
That said, typically, I think the problem for total beginner leads is in the "what to do next" bit - they can't go from one movement to another, all their concentration is on other things. Which is why, if they get taught a "routine", it's much easier for them to grasp, and it's easier for them to fake being able to lead.
So if you teach the lead those three, be aware that, to an untrained eye the lead will initially look less like "a dancer" than someone doing a relatively complex routine - because most untrained eyes won't notice that the routine is being repeated all the time. So be prepared to see a lot of arm jives in the dance
One way to get around this is to teach one "flash" move per lesson. I did the Teapot, they seemed to enjoy it.
But what you said here is my point exactly. When you start as a beginner, you just want to be able to string a few moves together and that in itself is progress to a novice. Personally, I think "learning how to move your body" either comes naturally, or can sort of be taught over time once basic moves have been learnt, but not in all cases.
What about people (we all know at least one) who have been religiously dancing for years and years, go to classes 2 or 3 times a week, know all the moves, but will never ever move properly while dancing or be capable of any form of musicality. Should Yli tell them they're a lost cause and not offer any lessons at all? She wont know what they're capable of until she tries a few moves with them to begin with.
Of course she shouldn't tell them they are a lost cause or refuse to offer lessons, i simply think the best course of action for Private tuition is to concentrate on teaching the things that you cannot get from a Class format! In the class format you can get your moves/patterns but what teachers on stage can never do is tailor the teaching to individuals, So i'm simply saying i think he would progress faster if he was taught technique from the outset rather than moves!
And in a group class, that's why they teach a routine. But in a private lesson, a teacher should be able to educate the student, and provide them what they need (technique), as well as what they want (moves).
You pretty much have to cover some technique in a private - otherwise why have a private in the first place?
Sure, commercial reasons (you want the student to return) mean that you should give them some sweeties in terms of moves. But you also need to stretch the student and get them to think.
I'd have to disagree. I'd also say that, for teaching a lead, leading definitely does not come naturally. Learning moves teaches you nothing about how to lead.
(Caveat: I assume Yli's done a reasonable amount of leading herself)
No, she should offer them technique-based classes.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks