I don't vote, and the only one I watch is Strictly, but if there was a serious campaign to bring Simon Cowell down a peg or two through voting for the most talentless competitor to win, I'd be prepared to spend some money on that.
Oh hang on, that's what's happening in Strictly isn't it? Surely there'd have to be some real changes in the Strictly format if Ann won? And just imagine the looks on Len's and Craig's faces!
So that's it, vote for change, vote for Ann!
Yes, but I think it was the Queen Mother who put him up to it!
And another thing I dislike is the spinning of a few minutes of interesting action into 30 minutes of airtime. When all the padding and the commercial breaks are taken out there's only about 10 minutes in each hour that I'd actually want to watch!
As others have said, I'm certainly not going to waste my money voting as I think it's all rigged to make as much money as possible for the programme makers, the broadcaster and people like Simon Cowell.
After last years successful campaign to keep manufactured-stardom off the Christmas Number One slot, buying this en-masse must surely be the obvious choice for a two fingered salute to X-Factor this year.
Isn't just "Not watching" and "Not Consuming", backed up by "Not Giving a Damn" and "Not Even Knowing What the Moronic Program is About" the best bi-digit tribute one could pay?
Now, where's that Grumpy Old Women DVD gone?
Not that the same philosophy should be applied uniformly.i.e. to Royal Weddings. Oh no.
indeed. but it is far cheaper here for the first track (the best?)
All well and good but according to this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surfin'_Bird
this
is what you're supposed to be buying this year (sorry - haven't quite mastered the art of renaming links yet)
so go here in december and buy it and it will get counted in the charts....
Maybe, but it's so hard to escape it all. Take Simon Cowell, not only is he on the box, but he also regularly appears on the front pages of various newspapers and magazines.
Yeah, there's more than one campaign, which means there's less chance that Simon Cowell will be photographed minus his smug grin.
Not really hard. I don't watch much telly and never buy tabloid newspapers or gossip mags. I read them avidly in dentist's waiting rooms but Simon Cowell wouldn't be my first choice of gossip material, I'd rather read about Cheryl Cole. I am aware of what he looks like and what he does for a living but that's about it. He does not trouble my world!
isn't that like saying you prefer swine flu to bird flu ? equally horrible, and rather odd to cite a preference. There. I've said it. You're odd
And I must admit to being bewilderererd* that people find the geordie twiglet attractive.
*yes,very.
Cheryl has an attractive face, but she is not an attractive person. Remember the "punch in the face" incident in the club toilets? (to name but one of her chavvy fau pars)
She's learnt to keep her gob shut and stopped beating people up, but Cheryl Cole is definitely not "attractive". The tattoo's alone would put me off, let alone the accent, chavtastic clothes and the attitude.
Each to their own though djtrev.
I agree, but while she has an attractive face, its of fairly average attractiveness. Put it this way, if she was an unknown in a busy city nightclub on a saturday night, she certainly wouldn't make the "top 10 most beautiful" in the place. She might scrape into the top 100 if its quite quiet
Danii Minogue is far more striking. If it was a double date, Cheryl would be the ugly mate .
I think Cheryl Coles most notable achievement was dumping her cheating husband.
But then, unlike most WAGs she actually had a choice because she had a bit of a career and some money of her own (so perhaps she isn't a true WAG?)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks