Depends - do you think she deliberately chooses not to follow your lead, or is she not aware of where she should be going?
(If the latter, then it may be your lead that needs development.)
Sounds like she's taking a few liberties on the "playing" side of things, verging on the "hijacking".
I don't think that clarity of lead makes the dance stagnant, no.
Firstly, pre-leading is not like you plan everything out in the Nth detail, 4 minutes in advance or anything - it not choreography. You simply decide what the next movement will be, a couple of seconds "early", and make your intentions clear to the follower in advance, so that it's not a shock for her - she doesn't get wrenched around or surprised, and she doesn't have to try to guess what you're leading.
Secondly, you may - and probably should - decide to give the follower some space and time to play / interpret; pre-leading doesn't interfere with that at all. It simply gives the follower more warning as to what's coming next.
Perfect clarity of lead should have no impact on the quality of dance itself - it's simply good technique. You can still do all the improvisation, interpretation, and connection - in fact, all these things should be easier with good technique.
Mmmm. Not sure your followers would agree that "not knowing what's going to happen" is a fun experience.
I always try to pre-lead; as I said, in my view it's simply good dance technique to do this.
All that said, I admit that I'm not big on the hijacking / partnership side of dancing, and that I rarely get sabotaged (my feeling is that it's much easier to sabotage a move which is "signalled", rather than a movement which is led). But I can live with that.
Quite a nice analogy I think, though I'm not sure how far ahead I'm thinking about moves. It can be extended, - you have to be adaptable so that if your partner makes an unexpected move, then you can come up with an appropriate response, (e.g. if she moves to a position you hadn't expected, you adjust your move to allow for a smooth transition). You also need to be adaptable for unexpected things happening in the music.
Greg
Take a look here Which moves do you hate
Greg
Pre-leading doesn't force a dance down a formulaic route any more than a clear or strong lead does. If anything, by giving advanced notice to the follower of where the lead will be taking them next, it gives them more time and opportunity to subvert the lead - through deliberate misinterpretation, changing the pace, adding additional spins or other forms of sabotage.
When the follower has no idea what's about to happen they are too busy following the actuality to do anything different..
I haven't learnt to follow but I do try sometimes with a few buddies.
It concreted in my head how subjective the opinion towards good dancers really is. I would never want to dance with a follower some of the ways that I have been led. (Possibly a slightly ignorant view as I'm not a good follower)
So I definitely think learning to follow has its benefits. If you don't like the way you are led why should anyone else, and so you can make your own leading more enjoyable.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks