More to the point, Skippy Blair is not an expert at Modern Jive. All the MJ experts are in the UK, Australia and NZ. If Skippy Blair wanted to know more about Modern Jive I'd expect her to ask me, not the other way around. If I wanted to know more about WCS I'd be asking Skippy.
There could be much we could learn from Skippy Blair to improve the way we teach MJ. But it's the way rather than the dance - we know more than her about MJ because we are specialists in that particular dance.
p.s. I think we all need a new forename or nickname that means something to a dancer.
Kind regards.
Hoppy McGregor
Plus, the more you progress in MJ the more it becomes body leads.
In fact when I think about it, I could probably dance a whole track with an experienced MJ follower without hands.
Experiment time, try putting your arms by your side and dance MJ with someone... I bet you could do it Andy...
For me it's a lead where your hand does not move relative to your body - your top half is usually an isolation. You move your feet, which moves your body, which leads the lady. An arm lead is where you move the lady by moving your hands relative to your body. As I said above, most of the time in Modern Jive you're doing a bit of both.
Where the movement of part of your body and not just arms dictates the movement of your partner.
Could be belly, shoulders, legs, feet, hips.
I have done excersises (as have other teachers) on lead and follow where you are not touching. In fact I have danced whole tracks with no contact and it has been a lot of fun, one step on, would be as Andy said, put your hands in your pockets and see if you can dance a track.
Something to try Straycat? - Give it a go with an experienced follow... is Lindy also relient on body lead as well, when done well?
PS, just re-read Andy's post, I do not agree with the just feet thing. My understanding of body lead, is body movement, not just feet, could be just about any part of the body, or a whole body moving.
Last edited by Martin; 16th-March-2010 at 04:51 PM.
It's very much reliant on body lead, to be done well, yes. Some teachers teach it with a certain amount of arm-lead for some purposes, while others will aim for 100% body. I'd say I'm one of the latter - not so much because I disagree with the former, but because arm-leading is more instinctive for most people, and it's hard to get people to break the habit in the first instance.... whereas it's easy to add it back in later.
Aye. As practised in Lindy, it's about where movement originates - which is never the feet, but always in your core. To say one's hand does not move relative to one's body .... it's a good starting point when teaching body leads, but the techniques quickly go very much deeper than that. For a simple example - there was a much earlier discussion on another thread about the concept of body-leading a step back, while stepping back oneself.
Come on Martin, get with the programme. Do you like "Jiggly"?Originally Posted by Jiggly Martin
Don't buy her this t-shirt then.
SpinDr
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks