I think that you would be correct for if it were any other member of the Forum. However, I continually receive insults from Mr Bartholomew. Take a peek outside if you are in any doubt. Why not have a go at Mr Bartholomew for picking on me? Or do you think his name calling is more fair than my exposure of him actually lying to the Forum?
In this case Mr Batholomew has deceived to the Forum. And this is not the first time. The reason I checked is because we have been deceived in the past. The reason I suspected Mr Bartholomew on this occasion is that he seemed to start responding with along the lines of qualifications being a waste of time and then changed his tune to say that he actually had a qualification that was better than the UKA qualification - he even talked as if he knew what he was talking about on the subject of the UKA and the LeRoc Federation!
Nice, normal members of the forum were debating the content of a course with Mr Bartholomew because they thought he knew something about the course having said that he'd attended and passed the course. How do you think those Forum members feel now they know Mr Bartholomew didn't attend the course? Or do you think, as it seems you do from your post, that those deceived members of the Forum should have been left in ignorance and continued to have asked their questions?
Bookmarks