I know what you mean but to my mind, if no official body has named them A-listers, and they're still generally thought of as A-listers, then it must mean that they've been acknowledged by a general consensus, which is pretty impressive.
I never said they wouldn't teach it correctly But if someone's searching for a 'good' teacher on the Leroc accredited database, their doesn't appear to be a way of differentiating from 'good' and merely 'correct'5. Boring people make for a boring class, though they may actually be teaching the moves correctly.
Its EXTREMELY important, when your employing someone to represent your company/branding, of course one needs to know exactly what your customers are going to get and be completely confident your going to offer you customers consistency and reliability!7. Exactly, why does CEROC care about quality if it is not important? If quality is important then have teachers accredited is important.
I feel like your trying to gather all the independents together, to form an alternative brand to Ceroc, under the blanket heading of LeRoc. So the customers then only have two choices, Ceroc or LeRoc.
I'm sorry but in a nutshell, it appears to me that nobody's crying out for this but that LeRoc just wants to elevate themselves to a 'more important' position, by scare-mongering people into thinking, if your teacher hasn't been accredited by 'us' then your in grave danger!
And this reads to me that once you've attained your LeRoc stamp, you can go off and do it your own way anyway.The Federation stresses that once accredited, you can teach a move in a manner of your choosing with the golden rule of consistency.
Looking to the future, if it escalated, it could be that people wouldn't be allowed to teach without this certificate, which would leave LeRoc in a very powerful position.
Or maybe i'm just being very cynical and suspicious
Bookmarks