Good grief DS, you can be a right **** sometimes...
Her first post specifically mentioned friends having a marriage break up (not parents, which is a completely different emotional circumstance) I then referrred to her post to suggest that what she was saying about mutual support was ridiculous and gave an example, she then replied giving an example of her parents, which isn't what she referred to originally.
It's got nothing to do with arrogance and all to do with referring her back to her posts and showing where what she's written doesn't follow on..
Must say pips I am with Rocky on this one, what has Cruella's parental problems got to do with this thread.
Again another thread has been derailed by Cruella and DS sniping against Rocky. Guys it is getting boring.
DS you are a clever and articulate poster, who is handsome, tall with buttocks like two Ferrets in a sack, but you need to rise above this hatred and get back to relevant and humourous posts.
Cruella, nice hair,
DTS XXX XXX
Last edited by dave the scaffolder; 11th-November-2009 at 10:54 AM. Reason: Ferrets and buttocks
It comes across as arrogant to me, more so in the posts that were recently deleted(so you'll just have to take my word for it ). You are specifically criticising Cruella for using an analogy that you don't like because you certainly SEEM to some sort of agenda against 1 of 2 business people that have recently fallen out. You seem to prefer one over the other, whereas Cruella is simply saying she is not biased either way. Everything else is nitpicking.
Sniping? I think you mean "responding" And "derailed" ? I never started complaining about certain business people in a perfectly innocent thread about the new JA events. Look elsewhere to lay that blame.
Perhaps under the xmas trees that ridiculous shops have ALREADY GOT OUT AND DECORATED! I mean really!!!
yet, you are still here, commenting. Do you watch paint drying too? Is it a hobby of yours ?Guys it is getting boring.
But I agree, this specific conversation is boring and further derailing an already derailed thread - so to keep this on topic - I'll say that we are seriously considering going to Manchester in February depending on a few things...(need to check out facilities for the children etc...). Oh and I apologise for being a bore
There is no hatred(*1). And when have my posts been relevant?(*2) I have less time to reply nowadays and do so purely to bring balance to the forceDS you are a clever and articulate poster, who is handsome, tall with buttocks like two Ferrets in a sack, but you need to rise above this hatred and get back to relevant and humourous posts.
(*1)or handsomeness, some would argue
(*2)or humourous, some would argue
DS baby you are better than this nonsense, your posts are usually funny, imaginative and informative this path of sniping/responding is not the path with the force. Where is the dry and humerous posts we all love and enjoy, come back DS.
DTS XXX XXX
Oh come on now.I have no problem with Rocky-I find him entertaining,contraversial(?),annoying and amusing but above all he has an opinion and he clearly states it.
But almost everytime he puts something on a thread you,DS,and a couple of others appear to be hell bent on causing unnecessary discord.
I dont know if there is any history between Cruella and Rocky even though they appear to enjoy a bit of banter on the forum,but the post that you have quoted had a whistling smiley at the end.
It was a light hearted jibe-treat it as such.
DS, I could post that a bear sh1ts in the woods and you would ask me how I could be so arrogant to make such a sweeping statement without having actually seen it for myself...
You'd then tell me that the statement wasn't true because bear's don't just sh1t in woods, but in generally any lush area where they can wipe their large furry behinds..
You'd also want to know the location of the woods and the bear's name (Kevin, by the way..)
AND then, even if I answered you with quotes, proof, pictures and news footage from CNN entitled 'irrefuatable evidence that bears do sh1t in woods' you would still ignore what I said and make a nonsense of yourself with some ridicularse analogy (which, of the latter, thankfully we've been spared in recent months)
So ... the 'facts' as I understand it are:
- J & W have divorced
- Money changed hands
- W seems unhappy about the circumstaces of the Divorce and mde his feelings known
- J may or may not be happy with the Divorce
- variuos people may or may not have been unethical depending on facts (that we don't have) and your own personal values
- Ventures close, Ventures open ... evryone seems to have the BEST DJs and the BEST teachers
- The Moons still circles the Earth and the Sun still apperas in the skies
..... and so did anything really important / different to the usual happen? Got a feeling of deja vu. In 18 months or so we'll be reading similar things about similar groups again ......
Oh do keep up DTS, my post was there before Rocky joined the discussion about JA's split, so how is it sniping against Rocky? That discussion derailed the thread long before I posted and probably should have been in a thread of it's own, but that is up to the moderators. Rocky had only posted once with his 'advert' for LUX.
I didn't see any animosity on the thread until this post:
Perhaps it's a bit dark and smelly where your head is DTS, come out and breathe some fresh air for a bit and clear your head, then you might read what is actually written.Originally Posted by Rocky
Shame I can't give you the same complimentCruella, nice hair,
DTS XXX XXX
I have just been neg rep'd for my last post.
To whoever sent it (anon of course) I was replying to a post by DS.It had nothing to do with being insensitive to Cruella's situation.
I am sure Cruella didn't look upon her post as 'opening up her heart'.
If she did then I apologise to her.
She strikes me as being somebody with the strength to make a decision as she did and cope quite well with the outcome
Cruella it is always a pleasure to read your balanced and pleasant posts.
All the very best sweetie.
DTS XXX XXX
Wise thinking on Cruella's part, staying neutral, it should ensure twice the potential raffle/auction prizes for her next charity dance especially if it becomes a donating 'arms-race' with the former partners vying to prove the more generous.
Last edited by Tiggerbabe; 11th-November-2009 at 03:36 PM. Reason: Reported post. Removed "naming" comment.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks