This is the experience of a person, at an event.
He has said, things may have changed now.
This a forum of views...
No need to beat up anyone, coz they have a view different from you, simply give over your view as well - did anyone enjoy the air horns and the general "enthusiasum" generated?
Did anyone else dare to sit at the same table?
You could say it was individuals, but it is a group of individuals and groups can have specific cultures.
It would be hard to argue Ceroc doesn't have a strong culture.
Ginger Jive could be separate / large enough to have it's own reasonably strong culture.
For someone such as dave the scaffolder, who IMO seems steeped in the Ceroc culture, a general opinion of another culture may be perfectly valid.
If perhaps, coloured by the observing culture.
Froda my lover a valid post methinks, however this incident happened at least 3 years ago.
I have become an adherent of Ceroc only within the last twelve months or so, I genuinley believe Ceroc offers the best value for money in the dance market, Ceroc and I have had some right old ding dongs on here, see my post on my 1st Utopia at Twickenham.
I am constantly astounded at the level of abuse Ceroc receives on this Forum which is a testament to the open and honest discussions that occur on this Forum.
Ceroc is the market leader because of the culture of improvement and listening to their paying punters. This is just my opinion, but any senior member of Ceroc would have had a quiet word at the time and curtailed the behaviour at that time.
Again, just my opinion.
DTS XXX XXX
Come along now,behave.
DTS-it was 3 years ago and they were enjoying themselves.As you say times may have changed.
I suppose its a bit like,oh I don't know,someone enjoying themselves by licking peoples heads or greeting others by grabbing their balls.Fun for some maybe,'yobish' behaviour to others.
NO DTS I havent forgotten the offensive PM you sent me!!!!
And you still owe me a drink.
There was a really loud WHOOSHING sound as Cruellas post took its supersonic flight over your head. We heard the sonic boom in Scotland
Oh dear now I imagine some future David Attenburger will be pouring over archived youTube footage in 2326 and pointing out "the culture of the Ceroc dancer" ...
"resplendent in black, we see the Ceroc male approaches a lone female, briefly separated from the pack, after carefully circling the dance floor..."
djtrev nice to see you again mate, a drink awaits you nought wrong with an odd abusive pm, I have had loads.
As for Cruella, were you there Crue?
As for separating a lone female from the pack, would this be the pack of regular Ceroc basher's who turn up at most events and do nought but slag off Ceroc, on this and the other forum. Yet moan and whine when there are no tickets left.
So lets not turn this into a Ceroc agin GJ bitch fest, because Ceroc has already won that war, it is my personal opinion.
DTS XXX XXX
Last edited by dave the scaffolder; 5th-October-2009 at 10:52 PM. Reason: why not
Bah! We've told you a million times to stop exaggerating, Dave.
How can it be a war until at least Ceroc marches into a small European country and one of the Rocov family posts that they've been misunderstood. "It's not an act of aggression! Honestly, they invited us, and we've been in negotiations with Butlins... ermm... HG Wells.. errmm.... Greenham... ermmm.. I mean the small European country for over a year! "
I really kind of agree.
A thread entitled 'Ceroc predation' strongly implies a load/bias .... in this case .... against Ceroc (of which my general view is only slightly, but not greatly disparaging).
There would be an argument to shift such a post straight to 'Take it outside'. Whether intended or not, it sets out battle lines to attack and defend.
Having said that, I really don't know what a more balanced title might be.
A tamer one might say something about 'profits versus business ethics'.
A lighter title - 'The Empire Strikes Back (or again)'
Baised the other way might say 'Success of big brand marketing'.
It seems to me that 'predation' in the lovey dovey world of dancing on an evening, sounds nasty and agressive.
Do I not have a point?? Pray tell!
you certainly do have a point and that was my first take on this thread
once again lets bash the big boys its a great way of advertising that we exist
Funny thing is that the imo best little people keep very quiet when this sort of thing happens they have no need for bitching and whining they just put on a good show and allow punters to take their choice
I have one very simple statement to add which will hopefully put an end to the speculation on this thread. There are so many bits of "hearsay" & "facts" with respect to one very simple transaction it reads like a courtroom drama.
As Owner of the Liberty Ballroom I can say that Val's post #5 and Rocky's post #72 present the basic, honest facts.
As Rocky stated anyone may speak to me at any time about the subject.
I could write an essay on the matter but I'm too busy refurbishing the Ballroom, complete with state of the art sound & lighting system for those of you whom we look forward to seeing soon.
(For the conspiracy theorists amongst you the work is at my expense & not that of Ceroc)
End of..!
Kind regards
Steve Hunt
Liberty Ballroom Owner
I for one want to congratulate Dave and Val for at long last having their own franchise
I am hoping the work and attention to detail that they always put into the utopia events will help put this new venture on the map
At this stage of proccedings I shall put my travel bag on the floor, ie I rest my case mlord.
Well done to Val and Dave and a great big well done to the Liberty Ballroom for laying this one to bed. Ps Cru I still love you, we just disagree on stuff, look forward to having a dance mit you soon.
DTS XXX XXX
Hello Steve. This is just a general enquiry to satisfy my curiosity. Having read Vals post again it would seem that one of the things that swayed you towards Ceroc and away from GJ was that Ceroc would do the promotional activities that GJ had promised but not delivered and that the promotional activities would increase footfall at your venue.
My question is Why is the volume of footfall at a particular event better for a venue? If you were charging a flat fee then it would not matter if one organiser was dying on his feet and another was rammed to the rafters as long as you got your fee then all things would be equal. Is it as simple as more footfall = more business at the bar = better profit for the venue.
General issue - I know nothing about Liberty Ballroom.
Some venues have contracts with drink suppliers and have to meet sales targets or face big price rises. This can lead to abuses like air-con off to both save money and to improve drink sales due to heat, and water prices high.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks