Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 7891011
Results 201 to 216 of 216

Thread: Conspiracy theories

  1. #201
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    6,709
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: Conspiracy theories

    Quote Originally Posted by CJ View Post
    ... and I thought U had generously provided a link, not just underlined your point!! Barry, I respect your position. However, I know enough paediatric PAMs (professionals allied to Medicine) who work with kids every day and here the same stories over and over.
    My mind is open. And, in truth, to both sides.
    So long as we are both in no doubt that the answer to unresolved questions is not equally likely to fall on either side of the question.
    (PS link text is a different colour)

  2. #202
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    6,709
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: Conspiracy theories

    Quote Originally Posted by CJ View Post
    And the general concensus on Foswell is....???
    Jesus Christ - Foswell? What's that? Or who? I never even heard of Foswell.

    (Not the athlete who...no, no: that was Dick Fosbury...)

  3. #203
    Commercial Operator
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Northeastern Parts
    Posts
    5,221
    Rep Power
    14

    Re: Conspiracy theories

    Quote Originally Posted by CJ View Post
    And the general concensus on Foswell is....???
    Assuming you mean Roswell, I only saw a couple of episodes in the first series, but it seemed quite good. Clearly it didn't maintain the ratings they wanted, because they cancelled it after three series, but I suppose that's not a terrible track record.

  4. #204
    Commercial Operator
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Fife.
    Posts
    5,701
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: Conspiracy theories

    Quote Originally Posted by Barry Shnikov View Post
    Jesus Christ - Foswell? What's that? Or who? I never even heard of Foswell.

    (Not the athlete who...no, no: that was Dick Fosbury...)
    Roswell...

  5. #205
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    36
    Rep Power
    8

    Re: Conspiracy theories

    As this thread somehow got my forum name attached to it (I wonder how - maybe it a conspir......?!) I wished to add a few last comments before it disappears into the ether.

    Firstly where do conspiracy theories end and paranoia begins I wonder?

    One or two forum members who have posted above, including myself, are very happy to dismiss most of the conspiracy theories imaginable (I'd dismiss the JFK one too, by the way), but remain sceptical about the information our government has given out on others. It would be fair to say however, wouldn't it, that some scepticism as to the government's stated position is sometimes healthy (after all a war has been fought on a false basis fairly recently).

    My old secondary school, an independent or grant maintained grammar school at the time I was there, were keen to instruct us students at an early age about pervasive, intrusive governments, and the dangers associated with these. One of the first books I was given (History prize, Upper 4C) was "Animal Farm" by George Orwell - "Two legs bad, four legs good" etc. - that phrase must seem odd, mustn't it, to anyone who hasn't read thee book (not that there will be any such people on the Ceroc Scotland forum of course?). Then there was Aldous Huxley's book, "Brave new world" too. Anyway, I hope you appreciate that there were efforts made by our teachers to ensure we didn't take everything at face value that our government told us, or our government did. Throughout our history we were told there has been misinformation in fact, for example from the "Bow Street Runners", employed by the government before the police force was set up, said to have made up threats in order to satisfy their masters (- an early conspiracy theory obviously).

    So, where are we now? Should we be more prepared to accept the views of those who feel man never went to the moon, or avoid being deflected away from whatever it is our governments may be up to now?

    I'll leave you with that thought...................... - no I won't, I still want to get to the bottom of this issue of buoyancy for dogs, and what they should be stuffed with to ensure this (maybe hot air perhaps ).

    Oh, and what happened to Double Trouble's original thread I wonder, another conspiracy I take it......(?)

  6. #206
    Commercial Operator
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Northeastern Parts
    Posts
    5,221
    Rep Power
    14

    Re: Conspiracy theories

    Quote Originally Posted by grahamg View Post
    So, where are we now? Should we be more prepared to accept the views of those who feel man never went to the moon, or avoid being deflected away from whatever it is our governments may be up to now?
    Ideally, I suppose, we should simply learn to look at the evidence and facts available to us, and to make judgements based on that, rather than on what we want to believe. Or, at the very least, to recognise when our emotions are clouding our judgement.

    Which, I'll grant you, isn't always as easy as it sounds.

    As for the dogs, I think I'll let you do your own experiments. Anything else would simply be heresay.

  7. #207
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    bedford
    Posts
    4,899
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: Conspiracy theories

    Quote Originally Posted by grahamg View Post
    ... Firstly where do conspiracy theories end and paranoia begins I wonder?...
    They all start with paranoia - This might be a plot. The rational mind gathers the evidence and separates the true from the false.

    One or two forum members ... remain sceptical about the information our government has given out on others. It would be fair to say however, wouldn't it, that some scepticism as to the government's stated position is sometimes healthy (after all a war has been fought on a false basis fairly recently)...
    I was told, some time ago, by someone who knew, that the most reliable source of news was the BBC world service very early bulletin. After that the man from the ministry got in ...

    My old secondary school, an independent or grant maintained grammar school at the time I was there, were keen to instruct us students at an early age about pervasive, intrusive governments, and the dangers associated with these. One of the first books I was given (History prize, Upper 4C) was "Animal Farm" by George Orwell - "Two legs bad, four legs good" etc. - that phrase must seem odd, mustn't it, to anyone who hasn't read thee book (not that there will be any such people on the Ceroc Scotland forum of course?). Then there was Aldous Huxley's book, "Brave new world" too. Anyway, I hope you appreciate that there were efforts made by our teachers to ensure we didn't take everything at face value that our government told us, or our government did. Throughout our history we were told there has been misinformation...
    I was brought up on those books too, and George Orwells 1984.

  8. #208
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    6,709
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: Conspiracy theories

    Since the vaccination scares have been mentioned here, I thought I would point out that in three separate judgments handed down on Thursday, three different US Federal Court judges (a type of judge known as a Special Master) dismissed petitions based on claims that autism had been caused by MMR vaccinations.

    There had been several thousand petitions under the US Vaccine Act (sounds like emergency legislation to allow congressmen and senators to keep their seats) for compensation payments for injuries resulting from childhood vaccinations. It was decided that one test case would look at the question of causation, and then the other cases could take their cue. The one test case was then extended to three. (The Vaccine Act does not allow class actions, unlike US tort law generally.)

    The senior Special Master, in the case of Cedillo, said:

    "The record contains about 7,700 pages of Michelle Cedillo’s medical records alone. The parties filed a total of 23 expert reports in this Cedillo case alone, and a total of 50 expert reports including the Hazlehurst and Snyder cases. During the evidentiary hearings, 16 expert witnesses testified in Cedillo, four in Hazlehurst, and eight in Snyder. The hearing transcripts totaled 2,917 pages in Cedillo, 1,049 pages in Snyder, and 570 pages in Hazlehurst. The parties filed six post-hearing briefs in this Cedillo case alone, totaling 462 pages.
    In addition, the amount of medical literature filed into the records of the three cases was staggering. In the Cedillo case alone, the parties filed a total of 658 medical journal articles, medical textbook excerpts, or other items of medical literature. Many more such documents were filed into the Hazlehurst and Snyder cases, so that a total of 939 different items of medical literature were filed into the three case files (even after excluding from the count those documents that were filed in more than one case). Some of those items were extremely lengthy. (E.g., Ex. JJ, 163 pages; Ex. L, Att. 1, 617 pages; Ex. BB, Att. 94, 306 pages.) I have not attempted to calculate the total number of pages of those 939 documents, but clearly the total runs well into the tens of thousands of pages. And most of those documents are densely packed with difficult, technical information, so that studying even a medical journal article that is only a few pages long can require a lengthy time period.
    Further, the complexity of the material involved here is daunting as well. The medical records, expert testimony, and medical literature involve many different subspecialties of biology and medicine, including neurology, gastroenterology, virology, immunology, molecular biology, toxicology, genetics, and epidemiology."

    All three judgments were resoundingly against the petitioners. In each case the Master found that the petitioners had failed both to show that the particular child had been damaged by the MMR vaccine, but also failed to show both that MMR was capable of causing autism and failed to show that thimerosal was capable of causing autism.

    The masters found that autism characteristics in the brain were relatively well understood and associated with pre-natal events, that there was a strong genetic component of autism, and that no post-natal events had been shown to have any causative link with autism. They also found that measles damage to the brain was relatively well understood, that measles virus acitivity in the brain led almost invariably to death, and that no damage to brain or brain cells caused by measles virus was of a type similar to the damage noted in autopsies of autistic brains.

    Although the tone throughout is neutral and bland, as is fitting for most judgments, the masters were all but scoffing at the inadequate arguments and total absence of even half-hearted proof in the petitioners' cases. They all mentioned profound sympathy with the families but were not shy of pointing out that their shared illusions in respect of MMR were fostered by the doctors concerned, one master saying that in his opinion this verged on medical negligence.

    If anyone else wants to read the judgments (more than 600 pages of them!) you can find them here.

    Three different judges all assessing the evidence - what (one presumes is) the best evidence the anti-vaxxers could come up with, in what (one presumes) were the best cases they could find in the thousands that had launched a petition - as not much better than worthless should hole the MMR-causes-autism battleship below the waterline, and put a big bung in the cakeholes of idiots like Jenny McCarthy and Jim Carrey.

    However, some US political dipstick has already made a comment to the effect that - "well, these are judges, not doctors" (who the hell does he suppose the judges would get their evidence from? Bugs Bunny and Deppity Dawg?) so presumably he feels that the jury is still out.

    Who'll give me odds on the theories fizzling out?

  9. #209
    An Eclectic Toaster
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    2,042
    Rep Power
    12

    Re: Conspiracy theories

    Quote Originally Posted by Barry Shnikov View Post
    (a type of judge known as a Special Master)
    B-b-b-but Barry, isn't that, like, a senior Freemason? All that judgement stuff afterwards - surely just part of the Illuminati plan?

  10. #210
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    London & environs'
    Posts
    3,938
    Rep Power
    9

    Re: Conspiracy theories

    Quote Originally Posted by CJ View Post
    ... and I thought U had generously provided a link, not just underlined your point!! Barry, I respect your position. However, I know enough paediatric PAMs (professionals allied to Medicine) who work with kids every day and here the same stories over and over.
    My mind is open. And, in truth, to both sides.
    Vaccinations contain bovine cells.

    There was worry when Mad Cow Disease was rife that CJD would be passed on through the vaccinations.

  11. #211
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    6,709
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: Conspiracy theories

    Quote Originally Posted by Astro View Post
    Vaccinations contain bovine cells.
    Evidence, please? Are all vaccinations affected, or just some, and if so which ones?
    There was worry when Mad Cow Disease was rife that CJD would be passed on through the vaccinations.
    You wouldn't be moving the goalposts, would you, Astro?

  12. #212
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    London & environs'
    Posts
    3,938
    Rep Power
    9

    Re: Conspiracy theories

    Quote Originally Posted by Barry Shnikov View Post
    Evidence, please? Are all vaccinations affected, or just some, and if so which ones?
    The scientist amongst us will know. I mean really Barry, this is common knowledge. Also it's the reason why many vegetarians have to avoid vaccinations.

    You can't just put a shots of measles, mumps and ruebella into a vaccine on it's own, it has to be mixed with something.

    Perhaps due to the CJD scare (the one in the 90's I'm talking about) they are now using human cells?

    You wouldn't be moving the goalposts, would you, Astro?
    Offside rule?

  13. #213
    Papa Smurf
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Planet Scathe
    Posts
    12,528
    Blog Entries
    6
    Rep Power
    18

    Re: Conspiracy theories

    Quote Originally Posted by Astro View Post
    The scientist amongst us will know. I mean really Barry, this is common knowledge.
    Clearly Barry, you are not common enough

  14. #214
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    6,709
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: Conspiracy theories

    Quote Originally Posted by Astro View Post
    Perhaps due to the CJD scare (the one in the 90's I'm talking about) they are now using human cells?
    Ya think?


  15. #215
    Registered User Jhutch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Balham, S. London
    Posts
    855
    Rep Power
    9

    Re: Conspiracy theories

    Quote Originally Posted by grahamg View Post
    As this thread somehow got my forum name attached to it (I wonder how - maybe it a conspir......?!) I wished to add a few last comments before it disappears into the ether.

    Firstly where do conspiracy theories end and paranoia begins I wonder?

    One or two forum members who have posted above, including myself, are very happy to dismiss most of the conspiracy theories imaginable (I'd dismiss the JFK one too, by the way), but remain sceptical about the information our government has given out on others. It would be fair to say however, wouldn't it, that some scepticism as to the government's stated position is sometimes healthy (after all a war has been fought on a false basis fairly recently).
    I somehow ended up watching part of a program on conspiracy theorists. Some people who had researched it reckoned that you could normally work out how much people would believe conspiracy theories from their own relationships/experiences. This backs up what you say above about the government.

    Or maybe the real truth is that the conspiracy theorists are right and the scientists were there to try and convince us otherwise

  16. #216
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    6,709
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: Conspiracy theories

    I think it's simpler than that.

    I think you can create a number, by multiplying someone's IQ by the age at which they last studied a science subject, and the resulting factor will very closely track the statistical chance of that person believing in conspiracies.

    The same factor will be a good indicator of that person's propensity to believe in woo.
    Last edited by Barry Shnikov; 19th-February-2009 at 12:06 PM. Reason: ...almost missed a chance to use 'propensity', an under-appreciated but excellent word!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Long replies
    By Gav in forum Chit Chat
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 21st-September-2007, 12:08 PM
  2. Eurovision Dance Contest
    By Lory in forum Chit Chat
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 18th-September-2007, 03:04 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •