Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 24

Thread: ...rid us of this turbulent prat...

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    6,709
    Rep Power
    13

    ...rid us of this turbulent prat...

    I feared this would happen.

    10 years, £20 million-odd quid and this nut-job is still going to make a nuisance of himself.

    Time for somebody to slap him with a general civil restraint order.

    He is (already, in my view) a vexatious litigant and it must be clear to everyone by now that it's in his best interest as well as our interests as tax-payers to quietly sideline him to ponder his sick fantasies in solitude...

  2. #2
    Papa Smurf
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Planet Scathe
    Posts
    12,528
    Blog Entries
    6
    Rep Power
    18

    Re: ...rid us of this turbulent prat...

    he has quite publically become bonkers - he first suggested Diana was pregnant 3 years after her death but his insistance that it is true gets stronger every year. Same goes for the "engagement".

    I think it's quite clear that MI6 have introduced hallucinogens and weird paranoia pills into all his food and drink to make him appear mad. He should take them to court

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Cider with Rosie l
    Posts
    1,314
    Rep Power
    11

    Re: ...rid us of this turbulent prat...

    He also needs to get advice on what shirt to wear with his suit!



    Elaine

  4. #4
    Registered User martingold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,864
    Rep Power
    9

    Re: ...rid us of this turbulent prat...

    Just to put the cat amongst the pidgeons
    personally 10 years after the event i neither know nor care what happened to Diana especially since it has just cost us as tax payers a vast fortune to not find out
    Having said that does anyone really think If Dianna was murdered would we be told the truth I am not going for the conspiracy theory i just dont trust those that are in power (and i dont mean the government as they are just the faces)

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Cider with Rosie l
    Posts
    1,314
    Rep Power
    11

    Re: ...rid us of this turbulent prat...

    Quote Originally Posted by martingold View Post

    Just to put the cat amongst the pidgeons
    personally 10 years after the event i neither know nor care what happened to Diana especially since it has just cost us as tax payers a vast fortune to not find out

    )
    Ummmmm.......do you apply that to all cases, or just this one? Personally, I think the case had to happen, just to put the stories to bed, but I agree, it does seem a waste of tax payers money!

    Quote Originally Posted by martingold View Post

    Having said that does anyone really think If Dianna was murdered would we be told the truth I am not going for the conspiracy theory i just dont trust those that are in power (and i dont mean the government as they are just the faces

    )
    Isn't that a bit like the witch trials of old days? If witches were ducked them under water and they died, they were innocent. If they survived, they were guilty and then they were killed?

    Let's just accept the verdict, get on with our lives and hope that Mohammed Al Fayed shacks up with Heather Mills!

    Elaine

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    East Kilbride, Sco
    Posts
    903
    Rep Power
    10

    Re: ...rid us of this turbulent prat...

    I think she was murdered!
    Imagine if she married Dodi and had kids to him, especially a boy, he'd be Muslim. Then Al-Qaeda would quietly bump off the rest of the royals so only Dianna & Dodi's boy would be left to take over and reign supreme as a Muslim king (ayatollah) of England.
    Now THAT's a conspiracy


    Only Kidding

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    6,709
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: ...rid us of this turbulent prat...

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Doolan View Post
    I think she was murdered!
    Imagine if she married Dodi and had kids to him, especially a boy, he'd be Muslim. Then Al-Qaeda would quietly bump off the rest of the royals so only Dianna & Dodi's boy would be left to take over and reign supreme as a Muslim king (ayatollah) of England.
    Now THAT's a conspiracy


    Only Kidding
    Good.

    Because to get to the stage where Diana's child was next in line to the throne would require the slaughter of thousands. Harold and William (known to the unwashed as Harry and Wills - blech) are there by virtue of being Charles' children.

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    East Kilbride, Sco
    Posts
    903
    Rep Power
    10

    Re: ...rid us of this turbulent prat...

    Quote Originally Posted by Barry Shnikov View Post
    Good.

    Because to get to the stage where Diana's child was next in line to the throne would require the slaughter of thousands.
    It was a joke Barry, that didn't require pedantry.

  9. #9
    Registered User martingold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,864
    Rep Power
    9

    Re: ...rid us of this turbulent prat...

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Doolan View Post
    It was a joke Barry, that didn't require pedantry.
    A joke??? Im shocked you could joke about such a thing

  10. #10
    Registered User martingold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,864
    Rep Power
    9

    Re: ...rid us of this turbulent prat...

    Quote Originally Posted by ElaineB View Post
    Ummmmm.......do you apply that to all cases, or just this one? Personally, I think the case had to happen, just to put the stories to bed, but I agree, it does seem a waste of tax payers money!
    Yes but it will still never put it to bed as we are now seeing
    One the nutter will still keep on about it and two it makes great by lines for the media of this country to keep on and on about unfortunately the whole inquest was a complete charade because those that believe the royals murdered her will still believe they are being fed lies ( and if they did i certainly wouldnt put it past the shabby lot we have in power to lie to us all)
    Quote Originally Posted by ElaineB View Post
    Let's just accept the verdict, get on with our lives and hope that Mohammed Al Fayed shacks up with Heather Mills!

    Elaine
    Now theres an idea lol

  11. #11
    Registered User Mini Mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Letchworth.
    Posts
    819
    Rep Power
    9

    Re: ...rid us of this turbulent prat...

    its horrible....all this fuss about dianas death...she wanted to rest in peace....shouldn't people just let her get on with it?

    for gods sake mohammed whatishisname leave diana to rest in peace!

  12. #12
    Papa Smurf
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Planet Scathe
    Posts
    12,528
    Blog Entries
    6
    Rep Power
    18

    Re: ...rid us of this turbulent prat...

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Doolan View Post
    It was a joke Barry, that didn't require pedantry.
    it was a joke with no grounding in reality and was therefore not funny. not worth pointing out ?

  13. #13
    Lovely Moderator ducasi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    10,015
    Rep Power
    14

    Re: ...rid us of this turbulent prat...

    Quote Originally Posted by Dreadful Scathe View Post
    it was a joke with no grounding in reality and was therefore not funny. not worth pointing out ?
    Since when do jokes need to be grounded in reality?
    Let your mind go and your body will follow. – Steve Martin, LA Story

  14. #14
    Papa Smurf
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Planet Scathe
    Posts
    12,528
    Blog Entries
    6
    Rep Power
    18

    Re: ...rid us of this turbulent prat...

    when the topics of the joke suggest they should be ? I think Brian wasn't thinking for a second there and thought Dianas children would have some path to the throne

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    6,709
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: ...rid us of this turbulent prat...

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Doolan View Post
    It was a joke Barry, that didn't require pedantry.
    One man's bleeding obvious is another man's pedantry, I suppose.

  16. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    6,709
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: ...rid us of this turbulent prat...

    Quote Originally Posted by ducasi View Post
    Since when do jokes need to be grounded in reality?
    Well, they don't. Need to. But that particular joke was. Supposed to. Be.

    Goodnight!! I've been Barry Shnikov and you've been fabulous!

  17. #17
    Registered User DianaS's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Lying in the gutte
    Posts
    1,477
    Rep Power
    10

    Re: ...rid us of this turbulent prat...

    he's obviously in the pay of News of The World. The stories made a fortune. Rumour has it ALW negotiating rights for a musical
    Kind of "Hamlet on Ice"

  18. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    East Kilbride, Sco
    Posts
    903
    Rep Power
    10

    Re: ...rid us of this turbulent prat...

    Quote Originally Posted by martingold View Post
    A joke??? Im shocked you could joke about such a thing
    Oh my, another member of the PC Brigade that's had a humour by-pass?

    I wish I could stick a smilie on the end of that to portray "Shakes head in bewilderment, while wondering what goes on in that dead from the neck up mind."

  19. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    East Kilbride, Sco
    Posts
    903
    Rep Power
    10

    Re: ...rid us of this turbulent prat...

    Quote Originally Posted by Dreadful Scathe View Post
    it was a joke with no grounding in reality and was therefore not funny. not worth pointing out ?
    If you choke a Smurf, what colour does it go?

    That has no grounding in reality either as there's no such thing as a Smurf but I think it'll give a snigger or two, only to the non politically correct of course.

  20. #20
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    East Kilbride, Sco
    Posts
    903
    Rep Power
    10

    Re: ...rid us of this turbulent prat...

    Is this guy a fanny or what?

    Am I allowed to say fanny?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. How do you get rid of your name of google searches ?
    By stewart38 in forum Geeks' Corner
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 7th-October-2007, 11:36 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •