Except that she wasn't pregnant. We can be pretty sure of that now - documented period pains, her own statements, and so on.
And she was shagging Hasnat Khan for two years before, including stalking him via text, and no-one gave a damn about that.
Errr, except that she wasn't pregnant?
Less in 1997 than in 1993-5 - when she was pretty much calling for Charles not to take the throne. So why off her, several years afterwards? If anything, I reckon her celebrity peaked around the early 90s. If she'd been around now she'd just be another Fergie.
Diana's death made it harder for Charles to remarry - she was turned into an icon, and he had to wait longer because of that, it would have been seen as disrespectful otherwise. So you're saying he's Evil, he's All-Powerful, he's Cunning, but he's also Really Dumb?
Of course, this is all assuming both that the Royals are a bunch of - literally - psychopaths, that they have any actual power to order this sort of thing, that the security services and other branches of government are so skilled as do it without leaving any of this annoying evidence stuff, that no-one in this massive conspiracy leaked, and so on.
Christ, the UK government can't even send a disc in their internal post without losing it - what chance is there that they could keep such a massive conspiracy under wraps?
But, even with all those assumptions, which are rather big leaps, there's no motive. She wasn't pregnant, she wasn't causing trouble, she was just getting on with her life.
You'd have to be as nutty as Al Fayed clearly is, to believe in any conspiracy.
Bookmarks