Sure - but no-one here's saying that, or even close.
What is obvious, is that anything associated with McDonald's is automatically treated with derision by our very lazy press. So the actual merits or problems of such a scheme get ignored in favour of "McDiplomas, they must be rubbish, ha ha ha".
Why?
Surely all companies have a direct vested interest in ensuring their own training is effective - after all, they're paying for it. Of course, such training will primarily be focussed on giving their staff skills which are narrowly-targetted, to aid their own business - but that's different to "nonsense / fraudulent".
Well, good thing it won't be doing that then - it'll be a vocational qualification, equivalent to a part of an A level.
OK, you've lost me now. Where does "training its staff" turn into "auditing its procedures"? They're two totally different functions.
Bookmarks