Originally Posted by
Rocky
You see, I have a real problem with that kind of comment and I'll explain why. Pontins have been reviewing there pricing policy for a while now and this is slowly filtering down through the areas.
If Pontins put the price up at Southport (and I honestly have no idea if they are planning this or not) and JA choose not to continue at that venue because the financials don't add up for them - why would Ceroc taking the slot 'stink'?
Remember Ceroc's motive in weekenders is slightly different to both Jive Time's and JA's. Ceroc don't assess weekenders solely on a profit driven perspective. Sure they would like to make money, but as a National company they see weekenders as a way of supporting their franchisees, for building brand awareness and also as a service to their members. On that basis the profit equation is less important.
Whilst my own view, based on people's feedback, is that JA give more value for money than JT and that Jon and Wes are also more passionate about what they do, the reality is that they would probably still have to consider the financials in a different way to Ceroc.
These things are never as 1 dimensional as many of you believe because you're not privey to all the information - so can we get some perspective here please?
Bookmarks