:headscratch:... I wouldn't have thought a science degree was where one was expected to learn tact... I would have thought it was interacting with people... yeah, that'd be it.
Oh, and perhaps you'd like to enlighten me which of my proper nouns, or sentence-initiating words lack capitalization. Or is baseless criticism part of your normal display of "tact"?
I realise it's something of a novelty in an online forum to actually read the words someone was using, rather than impute to them whatever you think they were saying, but I object to the way I think you've misread me. Here's a refresher...
Let's see, I made it clear that I ask followers not to use thumbs, because I have been injured, and go on to observe that those that have injured me have tended to be able to be described by a series of adjectives.
Do I criticise such a group as whole? No.
Do I say they're worse than any other sort of beginner? No.
Has anybody else criticised what I've said? MinnieM expressed dismay at the events that led to my observation, and suggested my experience was atypical, but didn't find the kind of fault Andy's created.
I've made sweeping criticism of a group...
...and nobody's objected.
Again, assumptions on your part, and wrong. You're right, there are non-physical elements to the dynamics of dance, but they're not relevant to the discussion at hand... which is how to deal with follows gripping with their thumbs.
Yeah... if she realises anything is different! If a timbp follow can fail to observe eight consecutive Man Breakthroughs (in another thread), then someone who's drowning their partner's connection seems unlikely to be up to observing that the relative motion between the members of the couple is wholly due to their own movement!
Bookmarks