Ahmadinejad's gone and done it again:
BBC NEWS | World | Middle East | Iran president in NY campus row
The relevant quote is:
He also went on to cast doubt about whether Al-Quaeda was really responsible for the Twin Towers attacks, and of course he's on record as being a Holocaust denier and calling for Israel to be wiped off the map.Asked about executions of homosexuals in Iran, Mr Ahmadinejad replied: "In Iran we don't have homosexuals like in your country."
Reacting to laughter and jeers from the audience he added: "In Iran we don't have this phenomenon, I don't know who told you this."
Still, it could be worse. I mean, he could be in charge of a regional superpower, building a nuclear weapons programme.
That's because you're executed them all!Asked about executions of homosexuals in Iran, Mr Ahmadinejad replied: "In Iran we don't have homosexuals like in your country."
Let your mind go and your body will follow. – Steve Martin, LA Story
I suggest not invading Iraq, so ensuring there's an anti-Iranian neighbour power, combined with unstretched Western military capability to use as a stick, and some vestige of moral authority on the part of the USA.
Ooops. Too late.
No, he doesn't - he's obviously pursuing a weapons programme, the "peaceful use" mantra is simply a convenient lie aimed at "useful idiots", to use Lenin's tem.
the proof that there are none left , is when they ask anybody:
"are you a homosexual? we promise to execute you humanely!"
they always get a NO
I think you're wrong. My view is that Iran knows it has no chance of getting anywhere with a weapons programme, but it has every chance of squeezing concessions out of the US and the UN by eventually agreeing to discontinue it's current project.
I am also of the view that Iran does not particularly wish to have its own nuclear weapons, and that like many people you too are accepting what is said about how awful the regime is in the same way that many people accepted in UK and US the rubbish about WMD and (albeit only in the US) that Saddam Hussein was involved with Al quaeda.
US, France, Russia, UK, Israel, Pakistan, India, China - those have all tested to my knowledge except Israel, which may have done. There may be other countries that have an untested capability - Japan, for example?
If you mean used in war, then of course there is only one.
No, but I believe the IAEA, the ISS, and other organisations, when they say they've found - for example - both signs of highly-enriched uranium, plus documents pertaining to the manufacture of uranium spheres. Both of which are only for use in weapons programmes.
About 8? Something like that, I think. Why?
EDIT: Blast, barry beat me to it... Ah! And North Korea, that makes 9.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks