What would happen in Britain if terrorists killed Prince William?

[Double Trouble]

sis calm down love you will give yourself a heart attack.

Diana was as we all know a great mum and a great representative for this country with regards her charity work and all the positive things she did for this country.

Everybody has their own opinions of Diana and overall they are very mixed, i dont think ive ever spoken to any one person who has had the same opinion as me and always people will take from life what they think happened or believe happened.

But..... the Royal family are in a position of priviledge and certain sacrifices should be made by them when they are in this position or they accept this position. Diana was the mother of the future king of England and she tried to act as though she was a normal person with no responsiblities and was all over the place with her lovers. Now dont get me wrong, the woman is entitled to sex, of course she is but she should have done what all the other royals have done all these years and kept it under wraps, represented the country and got on with the job she accepted the day she did I do.

Load of old pants.











*DT runs and hides from big sis*

[Trouble]

Load of old pants.

*DT runs and hides from big sis*

[David Bailey]

Diana was as we all know a great mum and a great representative for this country with regards her charity work and all the positive things she did for this country and other countries.

I don't know it, so maybe that's "as we all know, except for DavidJames"?

She did some good things, she did some bad things. As far as "Good at her job" ratings go, I'd rate her as "better than Fergie or Andrew, about the same as Charles, and worse than the Queen". 6/10 - 7/10, basically.

[Trouble]

I don't know it, so maybe that's "as we all know, except for DavidJames"?

She did some good things, she did some bad things. As far as "Good at her job" ratings go, I'd rate her as "better than Fergie or Andrew, about the same as Charles, and worse than the Queen". 6/10 - 7/10, basically.

Well unless your completely incompetant, which i know your not, you do know. We know she was a good mum because not only did we see that and feel that on the news, the boys do not seem to remember any ill doing on her part and seem quite normal considering they lost her at quite an early age under suspicious circumstances and it continues to this day.

With regards her doing her job as representative for this country, the income raised for any charity work she did was enormous. She only had to turn up and they would earn out of it. Job done.

[Dreadful Scathe]

Diana was as we all know a great mum and a great representative for this country with regards her charity work and all the positive things she did for this country and other countries.

Theres no doubt she did lots of positive things with her life - but so did/does Princess Anne - yet she manages to avoid the news. Partly because shes less photogenic perhaps, but mainly because she has no time for the media.

Diana was the mother of the future king of England

The Union of crowns took place centuries ago, do keep up won't you

Now dont get me wrong, the woman is entitled to sex, of course she is but she should have done what all the other royals have done all these years and kept it under wraps, represented the country and got on with the job she accepted the day she said ......I do Charles

Fair point. Charles was once quoted as saying he didn't want to break with the tradition of having a mistress - every other heir to the throne had one. I think some people imagine the Royals should be near flawless when they are as human as the rest of us. That goes for Charles, Diana and the rest of them.

[Dreadful Scathe]

We know she was a good mum because not only did we see that and feel that on the news, the boys do not seem to remember any ill doing on her part and seem quite normal considering they lost her at quite an early age under suspicious circumstances and it continues to this day.

What is suspicious about her death? She was in a car going too fast that crashed. There's no reason to think the Prince's subscribe to the El Fayed: "they done 'er in guv" set of conspiracy theories. Also as Royals they are not likely to portray anything on TV other than the positive. So DJ is right - we really have no idea how good a mother she was, and its not nice you bringing it up either

[Double Trouble]

Theres no doubt she did lots of positive things with her life - but so did/does Princess Anne - yet she manages to avoid the news. Partly because shes less photogenic perhaps, but mainly because she has no time for the media.

The media are not interested in ugly royals who smoke, swear and dress like a farmers wife clearing out the pig pen...also Diana had a higher profile than Anne

Fair point. Charles was once quoted as saying he didn't want to break with the tradition of having a mistress - every other heir to the throne had one.

I think some people imagine the Royals should be near flawless when they are as human as the rest of us. That goes for Charles, Diana and the rest of them.

That doesn't make sense. On the one hand you say that Charles wanted a mistress like all the other heirs, but on the other hand, you say they are human like the rest of us.

If the present Mr DT said he wanted to take a mistress, id serve his balls up to him for dinner.

[Trouble]

and its not nice you bringing it up either

pardon.? Whats not nice. Do explain yourself DS!

[Dreadful Scathe]

The media are not interested in ugly royals who smoke, swear and dress like a farmers wife clearing out the pig pen...also Diana had a higher profile than Anne

So the media is bigoted then ? You're right you know

That doesn't make sense. On the one hand you say that Charles wanted a mistress like all the other heirs, but on the other hand, you say they are human like the rest of us.

Wheres the conflict Its the flaws that make us human.

[Trouble]

, id serve his balls up to him for dinner.

very nice sauteed with a bit of garlic.

[Dance Demon]

Speak for yourself!
I didn't care 10 years ago and I don't care now, she was too promiscuous (that's putting it nicely) to warrant respect from most people I know.

.....although she did do a lot of sterling charity work, I still didn't really have much time for her. Charles was unfaithful with one woman ( that we know of ) a relationship that stretched back a lot further than his time with Diana. Diana had a series of affairs with several fairly high profile men. her passing had no affect on my life. She led a very privileged life while she was on this mortal coil, so I find it very difficult to feel sorry for her, just as I would find it difficult to empathise with the plight of any other member of the royal family.

[Double Trouble]

very nice sauteed with a bit of garlic.

...and a nice bottle of chianti...fafafafafafafafafa....!

[Trouble]

pardon.? Whats not nice. Do explain yourself DS!

Clearly DS didn't know what he was talking about either.

[David Bailey]

very nice sauteed with a bit of garlic.

There's probably a urbandictionary entry for that sort of thing...

[Mezzosoprano]

The Union of crowns took place centuries ago, do keep up won't you
snip
Charles was once quoted as saying he didn't want to break with the tradition of having a mistress - every other heir to the throne had one.

Re the Union of Crowns..... hee, hee yep.. it happened.. and until something drastic happens... he'll be King of the United Kingdom... not just England!!!

And Charles, well, what a stupid thing to say, Dumbo!!

That's my chances of being a Dame shot in the foot now!

[nebula]

But..... the Royal family are in a position of priviledge and certain sacrifices should be made by them when they are in this position or they accept this position. Diana was the mother of the future king of England and she tried to act as though she was a normal person with no responsiblities and was all over the place with her lovers. Now dont get me wrong, the woman is entitled to sex, of course she is but she should have done what all the other royals have done all these years and kept it under wraps, represented the country and got on with the job she accepted the day she said ......I do Charles

yeah, and the future bloody king should have stopped f..ing his mistress all the years through the marriage - I think as a future king, he had a bit more responsibility on his hands?...

[David Bailey]

yeah, and the future bloody king should have stopped f..ing his mistress all the years through the marriage - I think as a future king, he had a bit more responsibility on his hands?...

I can't believe we're arguing over who was at fault in the marriage.

Who cares?

[Dreadful Scathe]

yeah, and the future bloody king should have stopped f..ing his mistress all the years through the marriage

why ? thats hundreds of years of tradition you're asking him to ignore

[Gav]

I do Charles

Not you as well F.F.S.!

If the present Mr DT said he wanted to take a mistress, id serve his balls up to him for dinner.

very nice sauteed with a bit of garlic.

...and a nice bottle of chianti...fafafafafafafafafa....!

I can't believe we're arguing over who was at fault in the marriage.
Who cares?

The people on this thread, the British media and all the mugs that buy the tabloids to read about it.

But, FWIW,

[Dreadful Scathe]

The people on this thread

I think its only the females on this thread who care