Twenty's plenty.
I’m sorry its an old thread but I thought id start it again as times move on and things change
I’ve driven extensively in the USA and generally people don’t speed ,if you speed you get caught. Nice police officer pulls you over ,reads your UK licence and fines you
In the UK people speed all the time so cameras don’t work
Going up the A41 yesterday (60mph limit) I saw cars must be going 90mph + at least 15mph faster then I was going
You know how its goes see a speed camera and break sharply (which is dangerous). The famous M40 one !
What I want to know is where are the Police ??
I’ve said before im generally anti cameras , out side schools real accident hot spots etc However mainly there cash generating cows (e.g. average speed 40mph on M1 etc)
I tend to ignore them and they go away , most people pay if caught which allows some people to ignore them
If the police nicked all the 110mph nuts and allowed the nice 80mph people to get on with their business the roads would be a safer place ? I saw a fruit cake kid must be doing 70mph along 40mph road in Hemel the other, no way would he get away with that in the USA
Twenty's plenty.
In France you can drive at 85mph on the motorway in the dry. If it starts to rain the limit drops to 75mph. I think it's a good system, although like all laws in France, this too seems to be a mere suggestion
Speed limits are more important around accident black-spots. By putting a speed camera ("safety camera") in these places, hopefully it can cut the number of accidents.
Sure, not all speed camera are in accident black-spots, but then there are others reasons to have them.
Let your mind go and your body will follow. – Steve Martin, LA Story
I simply don't buy S38's assertion that everyone keeps to the speed limit in the US, it's not my experience from the holidays I've had over there.
Big news story when I was in LA about someone almost splitting a Ferrari in two hitting a telegraph pole while doing in excess of 150 on PCH.
Is it coincidence that road injuries and deaths are significantly down since speed cameras came onto the scene?
Love dance, will travel
In the 10,000 or so miles ive driven in USA inc Atlanta its just a subjective opinion based on fact
----------------------------------
Minnesota trooper writes 205 mph speeding ticket
WABASHA, Minn. (AP) — With a State Patrol airplane overhead, a Stillwater motorcyclist hit the throttle and possibly set the informal record for the fastest speeding ticket in Minnesota history: 205 mph.
--------------------------------------
there is no evidence speed camera save lifes in fact the opposite
As a newcomer to driving, my experience is obviously limited. However, it's clear that sticking to the speed limit here is not the norm for many people. Speed limits are there for a reason, and are legally binding. If someone doesn't agree with them, then they should campaign to have them changed rather than simply breaking them and putting everyone else at risk. That's just arrogance.
I can't understand why there are warnings about the presence of speed cameras, and those white lines on the road which mark the point where you aren't supposed to exceed the limit or you'll have your pic taken. Why help the speeders? It almost implies that the speed limit only applies to that part of the road and as S38 says, it causes sharp breaking, and then presumably speeding off again. Take away the hints - we are supposed to be driving within the speed limits, therefore shouldn't need these warnings.
As for the value of speed cameras themselves, I really don't know. But yes, more police might also deter. But then police are expensive - who is going to foot the bill?
Probably depends on the type of speed camera, but for the most common ones round here, the white lines are required to make the pictures taken by the camera usable.
The local cameras have a series of white lines like the edge of a big ruler, and they do the same job, because they allow the police to measure the distance travelled between the two photos taken by the camera. Because the two photos are taken a set time apart, if you know how far someone went (by lookng at the white lines), you can measure their speed.
Love dance, will travel
Oo, I meant to say yesterday I agree that breaking is dangerous, no matter what you break.
Except bread, I suppose, breaking bread is OK.
And molds; 'breaking the mold' is usually a compliment.
'Breaking with tradition' - opinions differ, I guess. A traditionalist would probably think that was dangerous.
'Breaking up' - hmm, well that's just hard to do...
Last edited by Barry Shnikov; 10th-May-2007 at 01:43 PM.
Last edited by stewart38; 10th-May-2007 at 01:46 PM.
I'll tell you when I've done it - haven't even been on a motorway yet! So I will probably be quite happy driving at 40mph
But as I said before - if you think the speed limit is wrong, then campaign to have it changed. In the meantime, stick within the law. (In this case, I doubt that mass civil disobedience would have the right... impact.)
Because the point of a speed camera is safety first and foremost - to get people to slow down. Put one at an accident black spot and give clear warnings and people will slow down. Little point in putting them up otherwise, unless you just want to generate a bit of revenue
Having a speed camera without clear warning is completely defeating the point IMO.
I'm sorry but that's just not true! Plenty of fatal accidents happen well within the speed limit. Let's not jump on the 'speed kills' bandwagon. Speed can be a contributing factor in an accident as can a whole host of other things - speed just happens to be something that you can measure arbitrarily and therefore is easy to police instead of concentrating on proper issues (driving appropriately for the weather conditions, not tailgating people, being observant etc etc)
Fair enough - as I said, I'm new to this game Although that does make me wonder why they don't randomly just put signs up instead - so you never know whether you actually have a camera there or if it's just a sign up to make you want to slow down. Surely that'd be cheaper and just as effective, and you'd still get some revenue. Or are you suggesting that they are mostly revenue generating devices?
My point was related to speed cameras, whichis what this thread is about. I agree that there are a whole other range of things which would help to reduce accidents. Do you agree that people should drive within the legal speed limits? If so how:
a) would you encourage them to do that if speed cameras aren't going to be used (and let's say for the sake of arguement that there aren't enough traffic police at present to do the job)
b) encourage the other driving skills/styles that will help to reduce accidents?
Love dance, will travel
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks