That wasn't quite what I said. Of course I don't believe in god, so I don't believe such a situation would result in them getting a visit from him. And I think it is unlikely that they are going to feel the need to invent a god.
Are the french supposed to be arrogant?Don't get me wrong Barry as I don't believe in the existence of god either, yet I wouldn't be as arrogant (and yet I'm French ) as to say that a god cannot exist (but I'll give you it's likely it doesn't).
I don't think it is arrogant to state vigorously that there is no god. It only appears arrogant because a) people have accepted the concept of supernatural divinity for such a long time and b) believers get so touchy about the whole thing. I am just calmly, mildly, stating that there is no god. Why is that a problem? Nobody accuses people of being arrogant if they announce, calmly and mildly, that there is a god.
That went over my head...Ignorance is the mother of all evils they say... I wonder if ignorance of ignorance is the God of all evils
Er...yeah. If there is anything without our universe, other universes, eg., then the cosmological constants there will be different. No way we could move things from one universe to another. The best we can expect is a mathematical proof of their existence that is unassailable.with the current level of knowledge we have from science... yes.
See what I'm getting at?
The thing is, all the material was there right to start with. It just took science time to develop the technologies required to carry out the experiments in order to reach conclusions.Consider for a minute the development of sciences in the past 500 years. From Copernic to today scientists.
Do you really believe here that we have already uncovered most of what was to be uncovered?
At what sort of level scientific knowledge will we be in 500, or 5000 years from now?
I think the main breakthrough was Einstein's proof that matter and energy are two aspects of the same thing.
The main undiscovered thing now is dark matter and dark energy. To be fair, these are big issues. One theory suggests that all matter with which we can interact makes up about 1% of the material in the universe...and the problem is that this dark matter has mass, that is, it is mainly postulated to get over the fact that galaxies are not massive enough for stars to clump together - they ought to just wander off. The fact that they do clump together has made cosmologists wonder if there isn't something else out there - we can't see it, it doesn't interact with electromagnetic radiation, doesn't interact with cosmic particles.
That's cobblers.Originally Posted by Andystyle
And you know what? I think you know it as well as I do.
I'm not quoting Andystyle because before long one of our posts will take up an entire page.
The thing about god revealing himself to some people and not otherwise is that it is fundamentally unjust.
If he is going to judge everyone, as promised, why should some of them benefit from favourable treatment? Contradicts the claim that he is both merciful and just, doesn't it?
Oops. Argument from design. Surely - especially as a designer - you cannot take that seriously? Apart from anything else if the universe needs a designer then god needs an even more sophisticated and almighty designer. If god doesn't need a designer, neither does the universe. Second, I bet you would take all of 30 seconds to name 5 ways in which you could improve the design of the human body.
OK, I'll accept your illustration of Jesus' prophecy about Israel resurrected as evidence. But good grief - it's a bit weak, isn't it? Also, we have all sorts of problems with the provenance of the new testament texts and whether we can in any meaningful (non-religious) sense accept that anybody called 'Jesus' ever said any of the things that were attributed to him at all.
God is good. Allahu akbar. It is one of the biggest mysteries to me how gods get away with having the credit for kittens and magnificent scenery but not having to carry the can for ebola and concentration camps. Hey ho.
Last edited by Barry Shnikov; 5th-April-2007 at 08:14 PM.
Really? Then how come you jump on pretty much every mention of religious faith and without fail end up turning the thread to yet another debate about the existence or non-existence of a deity? Sounds like a crusade to me, and as you're generally the one instigating them...
Look, we get it, OK? You don't believe in God, and you think those of us who do are in the wrong. That doesn't mean you have to hijack every thread that mentions an aspect of religious belief and turn it into a repeat of every other debate we've had on the subject. There are plenty of threads that have gone down that road already, after all.
I've always liked the idea of flooding. You over stimulate the nerve and your brain desensitises it. Which is why you can get capisum (Chilli / pepper) creams from the doctor for muscle pain. it "burns" when you put it on, and deadens the pain. Kind of like a herbal TENS machine.
I've always considered Acupuncture to work on a similar principle. But then I've never had it done, so what do I know.
You don't get it.
I start from the basis that religion is untrue and at least as dangerous as it is helpful. I consider that the lot of human kind will be immeasurably improved once these myths and fables are consigned to history. That's why I responded in this thread.
While it's OK for everyone to post their opinions here I don't see why I should not post my contrary opinions (where appropriate) and agreement (where appropriate) to what other people post.
It should be noted that my posts become more vehement as other people join in the fray. It's not like I posted 'Will's a plonker and everything he says is nonsense'.
However, as at this time I'm not in the mood to offend anyone, I'm going to 'down tools' for a bit.
(The above statement, however, is subject to amendment or suspension if an egregiously woo-woo post makes it impossible for me to keep my hand over my mouth.)
Not wanting to descend into the realms of "Oh no you don't! Oh yes you do!" but believe me, I do get it. I've read your arguments so often, it would be a miracle if I didn't. The point I'm trying to make is that there are already plenty of other threads you can carry on this sort of argument in to your heart's content, without constantly having to hijack new threads.
I suppose the moderators disagree, otherwise something might have been done (more thread splits?) before, but to me this constant hijacking of religion-based threads to make them into religion v. atheism debates is deliberately taking those threads off-topic.
Would any moderator care to comment?
I have no problem with you stating your opinions. What I do have a problem with is the way you frequently take "religion" threads off-topic.
We know your views on religion; however, sometimes some of us would like to be able to discuss it from our own perspective without constantly having to justify ourselves to you. If religion is a delusion, leave us to our delusion once in a while. You can debate / argue the non-existence of God to your heart's content elsewhere, and there are plenty of people who'd be glad to join in that debate with you in the proper thread.
A fair point. So everyone else who's been debating with Barry about the existence of God, how about giving it a rest here and engaging with him over on the Religious Beliefs thread instead? Please?
Thank you.
So. Now that the religion v atheism discussion should carry on here, does anyone have anything else to add in this thread?
From a personal view, I'm getting baptised this Sunday and I'm very much looking forward to it.
It seems to have helped him. That's great!
People have different reactions to help - I think most people think it is possible to help someone, some though are wary about it and some have been betrayed or let down so much (or not been able to help someone themselves when they wanted to) that help as a subject to them isn't possible or seems so.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks