There seems to be some kind of misunderstanding on the forum; people keep talking about 'scientific facts' as though there are different kinds of facts. A fact is a fact is a fact.
Science doesn't have to disprove the existence of god; it's just a fact that no gods exist.
If the proponents of any one of the literally thousands of gods, the existence of which has been claimed by humans over the centuries, wishes to prove the existence of that god, let's get to it. I can't see how they could do that without using scientific principles, but that would be up to them.
All that happens is that people assert (relying on the Bible, or the Koran, or some other book, or some unexplained feeling they once had or often have, or because somone else told them, or because millions of people believe in it, or literally whatever) that there is a god, and then as soon as someone says 'Don't be ridiculous, cannot be true', they jump up and shout 'Prove it!'
Won't wash. It's up to the allegor to prove, basic principle of philosophy, science, law, politics, every field of human endeavour except religion, where we are supposed to swallow the most egregious nonsense because 'you can't prove otherwise'.
Bookmarks