So does this site on all the photos other than the Storm ones.
So does this site on all the photos other than the Storm ones.
You certainly do have a lot of opinions/comments about events... its such a shame you don't attend events as much as you opinionate about the effects of the events. IMHO
The dancing at events is so much more enjoyable than commenting on it afterwards especially if you didn't actually go.
Yo u have a right to an opinion but I'd rather see you out there dancing than keep on talking about others doing it.
Photo sales generally are higher when using watermarked images. So, if photography is your income, you would have every reason to watermark your images. Not every owner of a commercial site realises this, which is possibly why there are sites containing non-watermarked images. Another reason could be because they don't know how (& yes, there are fabulous scripts for Photoshop CS2 which will do this, handling portrait and landscape images).
Not sure why sales are lower - perhaps a low-res version viewable on a PC/Mac is enough for some people, rather than needing a print - and others just print it out anyway as a pixelated postage stamp. And the earlier suggestion for scanning in a purchased print is a definite breach of the Copyright Act.
It's worth clarifying that the Luminous Frog (Jive Addiction) photo web site does have unmissable watermarks in the middle of their photos – the main difference is that, compared to those on the CerocPhotos web site, you can still clearly see the subject of every photo.
Both web sites appear to use the same software package – Gallery – which, I believe, has the ability to automatically watermark images without very much extra effort.
(I also agree that the quality of the photos on the CerocPhotos web site is far superior to those on the Luminous Frog web site.)
Let your mind go and your body will follow. – Steve Martin, LA Story
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks