I have to admit to knowing more competant fathers than mothers. And I know my own father had a lasting and important effect on my life. I would not have succeeded in life without him and his commitment and love for my family.
I know more men who are struggling with difficult partners (spendthrifts, lazy arses, or just plain unpleasant to be with - I have met them!) and desperate to remain in the house to be with the children they love, than I do women in the same situation (that doesn't mean there aren't any, I am just speaking from my own experiences)
I am not saying that there are not a lot of men who abandon wife and children when things don't suite them. I do know there are a lot of women who ditch hubby (for another man, or because they just don't like being with him anymore) and take the kids from him entirely - which is grossly unfair!
I know one girl whose mother left her when she was little with the phrase "I'm sorry, I just don't really like children". And I know of several men who were changed by their children - they became better people and stuck by their kids at the expense of everything else.
There are a lot of reasons for the increase in divorce rate. It does take two. And I know of more than one man who became a father 'unwillingly' and stuck by his children anyway. When a woman lies about whether or not she is on the pill, I believe the man has every right not to accept the child. The fact that they do says a lot for their character.
Men are not monsters. There are too many good men in the world to believe that.
As for diets - my parents had the opinion that if I got fussy, I'd go hungry. Funnily enough, I wasn't fussy. Neither is my brother. We were allowed our dislikes (sprouts, broccoli, peas, sausages - being a few of our combined dislikes - we weren't ever actually starved - a child will learn quite quickly that they won't get dessert or chocolates etc if they don't eat their veg.) but we were not allowed to suddenly refuse to eat anything but pizza and chips. We were fed a healthy variety of home cooked food and pizzas etc., and if we were good, were allowed chocolates and sweets. Both my brother and I are very tall and very thin. We eat just about everything and anything. We certainly didn't suffer from it. I thank my parents for their struggle on our behalf. I love my food.
I have to agree with Gav (was it gav?) on one thing - some of the children I see causing a fuss in supermarkets (each holding toys or crayons but ignoring them in favour of pulling things off the shelves and then screaming about it) need a good smack. Not a painful or dangerous one. A sharp smack on the bottom never did me any harm (still doesn't ) but it did get the message cross. Small children don't understand reason. They are not old enough to truely understand social rights and wrongs. A (gentle) smack they understand. I learnt right from wrong that way. My parents never hit me hard or did me any damage. But I thank them for their discipline. I wish more parents had the same control over their kids. And before anyone says it - no, I wasn't unhappy as a child. Far from it. Once I learned that "stop it" or "no" meant that if I didn't obey I'd likely get a smack, I just did what they said without much argument - and certainly without screaming or causing a scene in public. This meant they had more time to treat and reward me for good behaviour I had a happy childhood. What's with the kids who hang around outside asda in large groups running sharp objects down people's cars, swearing in loud voices and being a public nuisance!?
They get me really angry. They throw snowballs with rocks in them at passing cars. Do they not understand how dangerous and wrong that is? They could get someone killed! Where are their parents? Who lets a 13 year old girl hang out in car parks after dark? What is with people?!
*wonders off for sherry and shortbread*
Bookmarks