Seems to pretty much do it all: Phone, Music, Video, Internet.
And the looks are, as you'd expect,
More details here.
Seems to pretty much do it all: Phone, Music, Video, Internet.
And the looks are, as you'd expect,
More details here.
I want one!
Let your mind go and your body will follow. – Steve Martin, LA Story
when's it out? i'm going to save all my pennies!!!!
June in the US – "Quarter 4" in Europe, and it'll probably be tied to only one network – hopefully a good one...
Actually, there are a few things about this phone that disappoint me – GSM only, not "3G"; relatively limited storage; and only 2M-pixel camera, with no flash.
These things together mean that I *may* end up not getting one – at least, not until version 2.
Let your mind go and your body will follow. – Steve Martin, LA Story
I think I live in another world where I don't even have a functional mobile 'phone. The battery of my inherited Ericsson GA628 (very clumpy by today's standards) expired years ago. And I haven't bothered to replace it despite having nearly £20 of Pay As You Go credit with O2. Logic tells me I should have one, if only for 'emergencies', but even though I've faffed and tracked on eBay I'm still on the wrong side of the digital divide.
Can anyone recommend a basic mobile with particularly outstanding sound quality ? The Ericsson, for instance, was better than my BT Freestyle 1 home landline model which is abysmal. At home I now juggle between that, for its other features, and a Phillips Xalio for it's better sound.
Last edited by Whitebeard; 10th-January-2007 at 01:49 AM.
What a waste. Someone has finally got around to creating a multi function PDA with maximum screen real estate and easy finger use , then ruins it with just a single button, and no stylus.
There is definitely room for a couple more buttons at the bottom - I guess it is a style thing not to have them.
Shortcut buttons on a PDA make it so much faster and easier to use than having to look first for every action.
It has long been possible to operate PDA's with a finger rather than a stylus, and commonly done for simple tasks, though improvements aren't a bad thing.
Fingers don't work too well when you've got wet, dirty or gloved hands.
A stylus does make dedicated tasks much easier, and matters most when making good use of a high resolution screen
After watching Jobs' presentation, I disagree about the buttons - as he said, the applications don't need to make use of hardware-defined buttons - they just draw their own...
Stylus... torn. I use a Palm-based PDA at the moment, which makes great use of a stylus, and I love it to the extent that I handwrite all my text messages on it, rather than punching 'em in on the phone. I think I'd have to play with one of these before I made up my mind - I can't tell how quick that keyboard would be compared to a stylus - probably not a lot in it.
As for wet / dirty / gloved hands - with the first two, you'd be mad to be using the thing anyway without cleaning / drying them. With gloved hands, a stylus is very very hard to use (small and fiddly) - so I don't think that makes a whole lot of difference, to be honest.
Hold on bandwagon!!!*jumps on* i want one!!!
Apparently, Apple are now being sued by Cisco - that didn't take long....
True they don't need it but I'd need it to reliably select the buttons before looking.
Quite possibly not a whole lot in it as to speed, but think the keyboard would need far more attention/looking than a stylus/hard keyboard.
Definitely a point; however it does tend to reduce the utility of the iPhone compared to current devices.
Fair enough - i can think of thicknesses of glove where it would be difficult to use and/or get out a stylus.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks